Two more Apple amicus briefs
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:19:23 -0800 Subject: [Cryptography] Two more Apple amicus briefs To: cryptography@metzdowd.com -- a whole bunch of tech companies: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2746620/Apple-Amicus-Brief-by-Air... -- ATT: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2746626/Apple-Amicus-Brief-From-A... _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2746620/Apple-Amicus-Brief-by-Air... https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2746626/Apple-Amicus-Brief-From-A...
It may interest reader interpretation that the former companies may speak around being somewhat interested in customer privacy (even if perhaps motivated / bound by their own datamining TOS / profit interests rather than genuine), where old buddy AT&T may just want to be told what to do (given telecoms freewheeling events in history) while not mentioning any particular ethos themselves. Discuss... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_SHAMROCK http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/a-brief-history-of-the-united-states-governme... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qwest#Refusal_of_NSA_surveillance_requests https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Nacchio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAINWAY She also noted that no U.S. telecommunications company had legally refused to turning over customer metadata, "despite the mechanism for doing so". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claire_Eagan
participants (1)
-
grarpamp