A whole 'nother kind of Texas Patriot (Cyber-Resistance to ICE)
An appropriate use of technology. A heads-up for Immigrants around Austin Texas from a Patriotic American. More of this... RESIST!
Immigration pulling people over in the 78758 and 78753 area. Y'all be careful. Be safe https://twitter.com/SLR_Jr/status/830075824867012609
Depressing, i lived in 78758 for like 8 years... https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/federal-agents-conduct-sweeping-immi... or http://wapo.st/2kYK0kf -- John
On Feb 10, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
An appropriate use of technology.
A heads-up for Immigrants around Austin Texas from a Patriotic American. More of this... RESIST!
Immigration pulling people over in the 78758 and 78753 area. Y'all be careful. Be safe https://twitter.com/SLR_Jr/status/830075824867012609
<Screenshot from 2017-02-10 11:31:59.png>
While uncool, most of this is probably legal if they're doing what they say and "cross check"ing crime / license db's and other records against State's immigration db's, thereby establishing what amounts to warrant-ready cause as to any current lack of status. Unlike the stuff below which demonstrates plainly unconstitutional mass / random checkpointing, unreasonable suspicion, lack of cause, willful infringement, slope icing, harassment, lies, etc... https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=copblock https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dui+checkpoint https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=open+carry https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=filming+police https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=border+stop Either way, all this stuff is going to hit the courts and legislature big now, so yeah, lots of change possible during such times if you want to make it happen [1]. Bet the sanctuary states, counties, cities, employers are feeling stupid for all those db sharing agreements they signed with the feds who are now duly mining it all like Nazi's through their cardfiles... oops. They shoulda listened to the privacy adovocates. [1] If nothing changes, democrats will ban guns in 2025 and use their cardfiles the exact same way. And <power> will ... in .... and use ... .
Want to know what's uncool. The other day an El Salvadoran friend of mine with "Green Card, working on citizenship, was stopped by the police while riding his bicycle so the cop could ask him "Where are you going?" That's all. Just "Where are you going?". Rr On 02/13/2017 01:28 AM, grarpamp wrote:
While uncool, most of this is probably legal if they're doing what they say and "cross check"ing crime / license db's and other records against State's immigration db's, thereby establishing what amounts to warrant-ready cause as to any current lack of status.
Unlike the stuff below which demonstrates plainly unconstitutional mass / random checkpointing, unreasonable suspicion, lack of cause, willful infringement, slope icing, harassment, lies, etc...
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=copblock https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dui+checkpoint https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=open+carry https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=filming+police https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=border+stop
Either way, all this stuff is going to hit the courts and legislature big now, so yeah, lots of change possible during such times if you want to make it happen [1].
Bet the sanctuary states, counties, cities, employers are feeling stupid for all those db sharing agreements they signed with the feds who are now duly mining it all like Nazi's through their cardfiles... oops. They shoulda listened to the privacy adovocates.
[1] If nothing changes, democrats will ban guns in 2025 and use their cardfiles the exact same way. And <power> will ... in .... and use ... .
On 02/13/2017 02:56 PM, grarpamp wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
That's all. Just "Where are you going?". "To the courthouse to file cases against you." And then actually do it.
That's a good one, but I told him to say, with a smile: "Am I free to go now?" and patiently wait for an answer. I didn't tell him the part where you're told you're 'under investigation', and you reply: "What's the nature and scope of your 'investigation'?", and patiently wait for an answer. They COULD make shit up but typically they're just looking for a victim, will check your ID and go away. Rr
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
That's all. Just "Where are you going?".
"To the courthouse to file cases against you." And then actually do it.
That's a good one, but I told him to say, with a smile: "Am I free to go now?" and patiently wait for an answer.
I didn't tell him the part where you're told you're 'under investigation', and you reply: "What's the nature and scope of your 'investigation'?", and patiently wait for an answer. They COULD make shit up but typically they're just looking for a victim, will check your ID and go away.
Well unless they have defendable reasonable suspicion to stop, that's illegal, and people could take their video of that straight to court, get rich, and work to end the BS. If nothing else, they get to pay a small filing fee, go pro se, and clog the courts with something more interesting than hippies on reefer. Such token fees easily crowdfundable amongst their peers and youtube / fb / twitter followers. In those links you can search around for videos of citizens pulling over LE for speeding and stops on various other violations of law. It's becoming a sport. These guys have seriously huge balls and the LE turn into sheep, it's something to see. If these guys filed complaints and pressed cases, they could win. Cops stealing property. Cops pulling over cops, drunk. Cops murdering people. Escalation and arrests based on illegal stops. It's all there. Some statistical analysis of complaint case win rates between those without video and those with would be interesting.
participants (3)
-
grarpamp -
John Newman -
Razer