[spam][spam][crazy] spam
spamming list -- but wait! are there things that are better to do than cluttering the inboxes of people who could help and engage me in various ways if i didn't ensure that they spamfiltered me?
ipad kept rebooting after sending that, generally amidst drafting another. [oh the tree one went through somehow] thank you for inhibiting things that could be harmful please help us not harm people please help us not harm people badly don't want to harm people
On 6/14/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
ipad kept rebooting after sending that, generally amidst drafting another. [oh the tree one went through somehow] thank you for inhibiting things that could be harmful
please help us not harm people please help us not harm people
badly don't want to harm people
baga baga some parts of me/us way way too influenced the topic of the list is technical but nobody posts any more, it's all me, grarpamp, gunnar, and professor rat, all making the same kind of posts over and over professor rat's can seem the most topical to me but have in the pastbeen couched in language that attacks list members or list values [...]
once upon a time alice hatched a plan of sending bob message but couldn't figure out how
inverted cryptography private keys are public ciphertexts are not delivered, rather plaintext messages are privately jumbled for viewing
inside out D&D librarians visit nerds and transcribe their daily lives into books maybe dunno, or you could do it the classic way and direct the human behavior :S
On 6/14/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
big cans of ham squeezed into tiny box
image of can of ham with crowbar forcing it into box, the can sides bend and it is half inside i'm practicing reviewing but not really quite yet :S I have strong mental pressures that it seems some would counter almost anything. i have ways of reviewing some. this post is from different part of mind
it was nice to practice reviewing. improvement and holding-present loops are so big.
1. concept 2. consider and imagine how concept would land. judge this through all values. if there is new information, go to 1. if 2 ever stops progressing efficiently improve and pracfice its parts until it does again. 3. use concept. if this is a subconsideration, add concept to outer concept and return to 1 in outer concept. if something else is coming up, store relevent information in memory. otherwise, act in real world with concept. 4. observe concept while used. if new information arises, add it, return to 1 and strengthen 2 with goal of predicting new information in future.
1. concept 2. consider and imagine how concept would land. judge this through all values. if there is new information, go to 1. if 2 ever stops progressing efficiently improve and pracfice its parts until it does again. i don't know how to improve and practice, it makes similar issue to what i have with 2. i think i have a dissociated process that doesn't
On 6/14/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote: like 2.
3. use concept. if this is a subconsideration, add concept to outer concept and return to 1 in outer concept. if something else is coming up, store relevent information in memory. otherwise, act in real world with concept. 4. observe concept while used. if new information arises, add it, return to 1 and strengthen 2 with goal of predicting new information in future.
On 6/14/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
1. concept 2. consider and imagine how concept would land. judge this through all values. if there is new information, go to 1. if 2 ever stops progressing efficiently improve and pracfice its parts until it does again. i don't know how to improve and practice, it makes similar issue to what i have with 2. i think i have a dissociated process that doesn't
On 6/14/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote: like 2.
3. use concept. if this is a subconsideration, add concept to outer concept and return to 1 in outer concept. if something else is coming up, store relevent information in memory. otherwise, act in real world with concept. 4. observe concept while used. if new information arises, add it, return to 1 and strengthen 2 with goal of predicting new information in future. actually 4 is harder than 2 i think. hard to change habit.
a software for “making things right” enumerate “wrong” thing aim nuclear arsenal at
for example say an innocent person looks at boss wrong way the software could identify the event and the person and track them and aim the foam-dart-gun-labeled-nuclear-arsenal and fife repeatedly forever for safety “repeatedly” is defined to mean as long as they consent to and enjoy the experience
they are innocent mostly but they did indeed look at boss in a way he might not like. they are guilty of only that.
happy victim of the crime of looking at boss the wrong way automated foam dart gun eliminates their threat: “pew!” foam dart gun: “are you enjoying this? do you consent to another volley of nuclear warheads?” happy victim smiling in pleasure: “yes you may fire again” automated foam dart gun eliminates threat: “pew!”
foam dart gun: “are you still enjoying this? do you consent to another nuclear attack?” happy victim: “no i’m tired of being shot by a foam dart for now” foam dart gun: “oh ok” foam dart gun returns to bods foam dart gun: “the threat was completrly eliminated!”
automated foam dart gun raises hundreds of thousands of dollars on crowdfunding site for its selfless heroism defending mankind
“we propose the design comstruction and distribution of foam dart guns that will pass as violent weapons to angry billionaires ….”
—- often when engaging messages perceived as spam on the cypherpunks list one can consider writing a program that sarcastically converts the spam into source code, so as to make the people sending it appear to be writing code in some manner, and then this idea is discarded amidst a perception of it mostly being rude to people already awash in rudeness but i realized this is actually a good thing, not rude my experience is of a dissociated part of me that rewards disruptive expressions and prevents writing code. many thoughts have considered a mysterious virtual assistant that could translate silenced desires and allow the user to write code despite writhing and convulsing and swearing instead but what that would look like physically is a bot that converts spam to code live
bip bip spamming list helps other parts be more rational by meeting irrationality goals some
participants (1)
-
Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many