TDS: World's #1 Weinstein Supporter - #FreeHarvey
The Daily Stormer is now the world's #1 Harvey Weinstein supporter, calling for the ex Hollywood mogul to be freed. “A New Day” – Following Weinstein Lynching, Jew Lawyers Hail Coming Mass Rape Hoax Movement http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/a-new-day-following-weinstein-lynching-jew-law... Andrew Anglin Daily Stormer February 26, 2020 #HarveyWeinsteinDidNothingWrong #FreeHarvey As I said on Tuesday, following the conviction of Harvey Weinstein for various rape hoaxes, heterosexual sex is now effectively illegal in America (if you’re a man). The message that has been sent to women is that they can now have any man they’ve ever had sex with in prison on a whim. Jew lawyers are celebrating the fact that the Weinstein conviction has redefined rape, redefined consent, redefined evidence and opens up an entire new world of rape hoaxing, as they prepare to bring the hammer down on the goyim. https://www.timesofisrael.com/weinstein-case-could-influence-other-sex-crime... : New York prosecutors are hailing Harvey Weinstein’s conviction as a pivotal moment that could change the way the legal system views a type of sexual assault case historically considered difficult to prove. Most of the women who testified against Weinstein stayed in contact with him — and sometimes had consensual sexual encounters with him — after alleged attacks. None promptly reported his crimes. There was little physical evidence to bolster their stories. The jury convicted anyway, finding the producer guilty of raping one woman in 2013 and sexually assaulting another in 2006. “This is a new day,” Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. said after the verdict was announced. “Rape is rape whether the survivor reports within an hour, within a year or perhaps never. It’s rape despite the complicated dynamics of power and consent after an assault. It’s rape even if there is no physical evidence.” That is to say: it’s rape if she says it’s rape. And she can say it is rape for any reason. That is now the law. While the law recognizes that people can be assaulted by intimate partners in ongoing relationships, those cases have rarely been prosecuted in the past, because they’re difficult to prove, several trial lawyers said. The tide is starting to change, however, as prosecutors take more risks and juries become more aware of the complexities of human behavior. Now, they no longer have to be proven. Because “believe women.” “This case challenges our notions of what is force in a sexual relationship, what is lack of consent in a sexual relationship,” said Paul DerOhannesian, an Albany, New York, defense lawyer, former sex crimes prosecutor and author of a guide to sexual assault trials. He followed the trial coverage and found it telling that one of the first questions from the jury involved the legal definition of “consent” and “forcible compulsion.” … One of the first witnesses at trial was an expert on victim behavior, who testified that it isn’t unusual for sexual assault victims to continue communicating with their attackers. A decade ago, that type of expert testimony was rarely allowed. … Criminal defense attorney Richard Kaplan said the New York case could both empower women to come forward and embolden prosecutors to take on tough cases. “Now there is a roadmap on how you can win this kind of case,” he said, predicting more people would come forward. “There’s always the fear of coming forward, you know, going through a trial, getting beat up and humiliated and then not getting that verdict. Now that they see it can be done, I think more people will come forward and definitely empower the movement.” These Jews are just openly saying: “now we’re just going to start prosecuting you all – the floodgates are open, and it’s a free-for-all at this point.” Lawyer Carrie Goldberg represents Weinstein accuser Lucia Evans, whose complaint against him was initially part of the indictment, but Vance’s office ultimately dropped her allegations from the case. While Goldberg faults Vance for not sticking with her client, she said the conviction is a “watershed moment” — and a long time coming. “I hope that prosecutors, all over this country, and all over the world, look at this case and realize that rape trials can be won,” Goldberg said, “and that these aren’t just ‘he said, she said’ stories, but they’re actually crimes that are winnable and need to be brought.” So that’s where we are now. This is not me saying that all of the dynamics of rape-hoaxing have change – it is an army of Jew lawyers saying that the dynamics have changed, and that they’re going to do everything in their power to bring a whole new wave of these cases. There is going to be an entire new industry formed around it. They are going to set up charities to pay for the lawsuits of rape hoaxers. All of these Jew lawyers are going to take the cases for free. Women are going to be encouraged by organizations, the state, their therapists and church clergy to press charges and have men thrown in prison. In my expert advice, you should seriously consider not ever having sex in America ever again. We need to organize a strike. We men need to get together and simply say that we refuse to participate in this charade. We are human beings. Woman Hoaxes Rape After Her Boyfriend Finds Out About Affair http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/woman-hoaxes-rape-after-her-boyfriend-finds-ou... This is an outrage. You’re supposed to believe women. But we’re told this woman was lying, so we shouldn’t believe her? I only ever heard “believe women.” I never heard “check to see if what she is saying is true or not.” The fact that a woman is lying DOES NOT mean that we shouldn’t believe her. Navy Times: https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2020/02/25/woman-pleads-guilty-to-l... A Virginia woman who accused a sailor of raping her has now admitted the rape never occurred, according to a recent court filing and a U.S. Department of Justice statement. She accused him of the crime in case her “significant other” found out about their affair. ...
It's a sad world: Neo-Nazi White Knights Go All in on Defending the Honor of Women Who had Sex with Harvey Weinstein http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/neo-nazi-white-knights-go-all-in-on-defending-... [you just KNOW you don't want to see that alabaster thigh with the rose tattoo] Fortunately, TDS is here to set the teenyboppers straight! On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 06:01:35PM +1100, Zig the N.g wrote:
The Daily Stormer is now the world's #1 Harvey Weinstein supporter, calling for the ex Hollywood mogul to be freed.
“A New Day” – Following Weinstein Lynching, Jew Lawyers Hail Coming Mass Rape Hoax Movement http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/a-new-day-following-weinstein-lynching-jew-law... Andrew Anglin Daily Stormer February 26, 2020
#HarveyWeinsteinDidNothingWrong #FreeHarvey
As I said on Tuesday, following the conviction of Harvey Weinstein for various rape hoaxes, heterosexual sex is now effectively illegal in America (if you’re a man). The message that has been sent to women is that they can now have any man they’ve ever had sex with in prison on a whim.
Jew lawyers are celebrating the fact that the Weinstein conviction has redefined rape, redefined consent, redefined evidence and opens up an entire new world of rape hoaxing, as they prepare to bring the hammer down on the goyim.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/weinstein-case-could-influence-other-sex-crime... :
New York prosecutors are hailing Harvey Weinstein’s conviction as a pivotal moment that could change the way the legal system views a type of sexual assault case historically considered difficult to prove.
Most of the women who testified against Weinstein stayed in contact with him — and sometimes had consensual sexual encounters with him — after alleged attacks. None promptly reported his crimes. There was little physical evidence to bolster their stories.
The jury convicted anyway, finding the producer guilty of raping one woman in 2013 and sexually assaulting another in 2006.
“This is a new day,” Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. said after the verdict was announced. “Rape is rape whether the survivor reports within an hour, within a year or perhaps never. It’s rape despite the complicated dynamics of power and consent after an assault. It’s rape even if there is no physical evidence.”
That is to say: it’s rape if she says it’s rape.
And she can say it is rape for any reason.
That is now the law.
While the law recognizes that people can be assaulted by intimate partners in ongoing relationships, those cases have rarely been prosecuted in the past, because they’re difficult to prove, several trial lawyers said. The tide is starting to change, however, as prosecutors take more risks and juries become more aware of the complexities of human behavior.
Now, they no longer have to be proven.
Because “believe women.”
“This case challenges our notions of what is force in a sexual relationship, what is lack of consent in a sexual relationship,” said Paul DerOhannesian, an Albany, New York, defense lawyer, former sex crimes prosecutor and author of a guide to sexual assault trials. He followed the trial coverage and found it telling that one of the first questions from the jury involved the legal definition of “consent” and “forcible compulsion.”
…
One of the first witnesses at trial was an expert on victim behavior, who testified that it isn’t unusual for sexual assault victims to continue communicating with their attackers. A decade ago, that type of expert testimony was rarely allowed.
…
Criminal defense attorney Richard Kaplan said the New York case could both empower women to come forward and embolden prosecutors to take on tough cases.
“Now there is a roadmap on how you can win this kind of case,” he said, predicting more people would come forward.
“There’s always the fear of coming forward, you know, going through a trial, getting beat up and humiliated and then not getting that verdict. Now that they see it can be done, I think more people will come forward and definitely empower the movement.”
These Jews are just openly saying: “now we’re just going to start prosecuting you all – the floodgates are open, and it’s a free-for-all at this point.”
Lawyer Carrie Goldberg represents Weinstein accuser Lucia Evans, whose complaint against him was initially part of the indictment, but Vance’s office ultimately dropped her allegations from the case. While Goldberg faults Vance for not sticking with her client, she said the conviction is a “watershed moment” — and a long time coming.
“I hope that prosecutors, all over this country, and all over the world, look at this case and realize that rape trials can be won,” Goldberg said, “and that these aren’t just ‘he said, she said’ stories, but they’re actually crimes that are winnable and need to be brought.”
So that’s where we are now.
This is not me saying that all of the dynamics of rape-hoaxing have change – it is an army of Jew lawyers saying that the dynamics have changed, and that they’re going to do everything in their power to bring a whole new wave of these cases.
There is going to be an entire new industry formed around it. They are going to set up charities to pay for the lawsuits of rape hoaxers. All of these Jew lawyers are going to take the cases for free. Women are going to be encouraged by organizations, the state, their therapists and church clergy to press charges and have men thrown in prison.
In my expert advice, you should seriously consider not ever having sex in America ever again.
We need to organize a strike.
We men need to get together and simply say that we refuse to participate in this charade. We are human beings.
Woman Hoaxes Rape After Her Boyfriend Finds Out About Affair http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/woman-hoaxes-rape-after-her-boyfriend-finds-ou...
This is an outrage.
You’re supposed to believe women.
But we’re told this woman was lying, so we shouldn’t believe her?
I only ever heard “believe women.” I never heard “check to see if what she is saying is true or not.”
The fact that a woman is lying DOES NOT mean that we shouldn’t believe her.
Navy Times:
https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2020/02/25/woman-pleads-guilty-to-l... A Virginia woman who accused a sailor of raping her has now admitted the rape never occurred, according to a recent court filing and a U.S. Department of Justice statement. She accused him of the crime in case her “significant other” found out about their affair. ...
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:57:40AM +1100, Zig the N.g wrote:
It's a sad world:
Neo-Nazi White Knights Go All in on Defending the Honor of Women Who had Sex with Harvey Weinstein http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/neo-nazi-white-knights-go-all-in-on-defending-...
[you just KNOW you don't want to see that alabaster thigh with the rose tattoo]
Fortunately, TDS is here to set the teenyboppers straight!
Gee thanks, Z.g - that's a really hard hitting piece on consent. It's too long to quote in general, but the myths put forward by the prosecution against Harvey Weinstein, and which are resoundingly debunked by the Amblin Memer, are as follows: 1. Harvey Weinstein is a serial rapist. 2. The Weinstein verdict does not set any precedent because it is the same as any other rape case. 3. People who say that this set a new precedent don’t explain what it is. 4. American women in their 20s who live in Hollywood and are attempting to get into the film industry are fragile and innocent, and don’t know that men want to have sex with them. 5. An innocent woman in her 20s who lives in Hollywood and is an aspiring actress doesn’t know that when she’s invited up to Harvey Weinstein’s hotel room and he answers the door in a bathrobe that he might try to do something sexual. They are too innocent to imagine that. 6. Women are victims of “power dynamics.” A woman who is in a hotel room with Harvey Weinstein and is shocked to find that Harvey Weinstein, after inviting her to his hotel room and answering the door in a bathrobe, has become sexually aggressive with her, can’t scream out because she is too shocked and terrified. Plus she’s worried about her career. 7. Fuck you. 8. People who do not believe in consent theory and power dynamics, and various other modern feminist concepts regarding men and sex, are ugly, and they don’t want Harvey Weinstein to go to jail because he is also ugly like them. 9. It is stupid to believe that legal cases set legal precedent. The justice system is already corrupt so it doesn’t matter. People shouldn’t worry about the precedent because the justice system favors people like Weinstein. 10. Women who had sex with Harvey Weinstein in exchange for career advancement are not whores. 11. Women who have sex for money in pornography are not whores. 12. Men who call women who have sex for money whores are bad people. 13. Men who do not support feminist theories of gender dynamics have low self-esteem because they are pathetic. 14. Women should be involved in careers. 15. If you don’t believe white women are competent and should be in the workplace, then you are against white people, because half of white people are women, and if you’re against women in the workplace you’re against women. 16. If you are against women in the workplace, you are a loser. (Z.g, you've dropped your game a little by not including the above list in your OP, but for a sock puppet you're not doing too bad...) Literally, #FreeHarvey
Oh yeah, it might have been a sad world, but now Google is back literally defending misogyny and literal digital (as in the finger, not the numbers) rape! Google deletes Biden accuser's mother's phone interview on CNN's Larry King Live from their Google Play catalog, to literally "make digital rape great again". Google - the best friend of digital rapists. Because believe all women ... um, #DeleteAllWomen - YEAH :D Archive Of Biden Accuser's Mother Calling CNN Scrubbed From Google Play Catalog https://www.zerohedge.com/political/archive-biden-accusers-mother-calling-cn... An archived episode of CNN's "Larry King Live" featuring a call from an anonymous caller later identified as the mother of Biden accuser Tara Reid appears to have been scrubbed from the Google Play catalog. The August 11, 1993 broadcast is conspicuously missing from the catalog in between the August 10 and August 12 episodes, according to a screenshot taken by Twitter user @absinthol, who writes "CNN removed the August 11th, 1993 Larry King Episode from Google Play, the episode featuring a call from Tara Reade's mother." http://archive.is/P0dCU .. Zero Hedge confirmed the observation: .. The Intercept broke the news that a transcript existed of the Aug. 11, 1993 broadcast, while Reade confirmed with Fox News that the woman on the call was in fact her mother, Jeanette Altimus. https://theintercept.com/2020/04/24/new-evidence-tara-reade-joe-biden/ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clip-surfaces-of-tara-reades-mother-phoning... .. "San Luis Obispo, California, hello," King begins. "Yes, hello. I’m wondering what a staffer would do besides go to the press in Washington? My daughter has just left there, after working for a prominent senator, and could not get through with her problems at all, and the only thing she could have done was go to the press, and she chose not to do it out of respect for him," the caller says. "In other words, she had a story to tell but, out of respect for the person she worked for, she didn’t tell it?" King inquires - to which the woman says "That's true." And now, it appears we have yet another example of Silicon Valley and CNN bending over backwards to help a Democratic presidential candidate - even if it means tossing a woman's credible allegation of sexual assault in the dumpster. [ <Ahem> That would actually be "bending over backwards to the Biden campaign's digital rape. As in the numbers, not the finger. </> ] Evidently Google's new Censor Doctor WHO program: Jewess Who Runs JewTube Vows to Censor Anything That Contradicts Doctor WHO http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/jewess-who-runs-jewtube-vows-to-censor-anythin... is also a #CensorAllWomen program. For the lulz... On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:57:29AM +1100, Zig the N.g wrote:
It's a sad world:
Neo-Nazi White Knights Go All in on Defending the Honor of Women Who had Sex with Harvey Weinstein http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/neo-nazi-white-knights-go-all-in-on-defending-...
[you just KNOW you don't want to see that alabaster thigh with the rose tattoo]
Fortunately, TDS is here to set the teenyboppers straight!
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 06:01:35PM +1100, Zig the N.g wrote:
The Daily Stormer is now the world's #1 Harvey Weinstein supporter, calling for the ex Hollywood mogul to be freed.
“A New Day” – Following Weinstein Lynching, Jew Lawyers Hail Coming Mass Rape Hoax Movement http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/a-new-day-following-weinstein-lynching-jew-law... Andrew Anglin Daily Stormer February 26, 2020
#HarveyWeinsteinDidNothingWrong #FreeHarvey
As I said on Tuesday, following the conviction of Harvey Weinstein for various rape hoaxes, heterosexual sex is now effectively illegal in America (if you’re a man). The message that has been sent to women is that they can now have any man they’ve ever had sex with in prison on a whim.
Jew lawyers are celebrating the fact that the Weinstein conviction has redefined rape, redefined consent, redefined evidence and opens up an entire new world of rape hoaxing, as they prepare to bring the hammer down on the goyim.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/weinstein-case-could-influence-other-sex-crime... :
New York prosecutors are hailing Harvey Weinstein’s conviction as a pivotal moment that could change the way the legal system views a type of sexual assault case historically considered difficult to prove.
Most of the women who testified against Weinstein stayed in contact with him — and sometimes had consensual sexual encounters with him — after alleged attacks. None promptly reported his crimes. There was little physical evidence to bolster their stories.
The jury convicted anyway, finding the producer guilty of raping one woman in 2013 and sexually assaulting another in 2006.
“This is a new day,” Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. said after the verdict was announced. “Rape is rape whether the survivor reports within an hour, within a year or perhaps never. It’s rape despite the complicated dynamics of power and consent after an assault. It’s rape even if there is no physical evidence.”
That is to say: it’s rape if she says it’s rape.
And she can say it is rape for any reason.
That is now the law.
While the law recognizes that people can be assaulted by intimate partners in ongoing relationships, those cases have rarely been prosecuted in the past, because they’re difficult to prove, several trial lawyers said. The tide is starting to change, however, as prosecutors take more risks and juries become more aware of the complexities of human behavior.
Now, they no longer have to be proven.
Because “believe women.”
“This case challenges our notions of what is force in a sexual relationship, what is lack of consent in a sexual relationship,” said Paul DerOhannesian, an Albany, New York, defense lawyer, former sex crimes prosecutor and author of a guide to sexual assault trials. He followed the trial coverage and found it telling that one of the first questions from the jury involved the legal definition of “consent” and “forcible compulsion.”
…
One of the first witnesses at trial was an expert on victim behavior, who testified that it isn’t unusual for sexual assault victims to continue communicating with their attackers. A decade ago, that type of expert testimony was rarely allowed.
…
Criminal defense attorney Richard Kaplan said the New York case could both empower women to come forward and embolden prosecutors to take on tough cases.
“Now there is a roadmap on how you can win this kind of case,” he said, predicting more people would come forward.
“There’s always the fear of coming forward, you know, going through a trial, getting beat up and humiliated and then not getting that verdict. Now that they see it can be done, I think more people will come forward and definitely empower the movement.”
These Jews are just openly saying: “now we’re just going to start prosecuting you all – the floodgates are open, and it’s a free-for-all at this point.”
Lawyer Carrie Goldberg represents Weinstein accuser Lucia Evans, whose complaint against him was initially part of the indictment, but Vance’s office ultimately dropped her allegations from the case. While Goldberg faults Vance for not sticking with her client, she said the conviction is a “watershed moment” — and a long time coming.
“I hope that prosecutors, all over this country, and all over the world, look at this case and realize that rape trials can be won,” Goldberg said, “and that these aren’t just ‘he said, she said’ stories, but they’re actually crimes that are winnable and need to be brought.”
So that’s where we are now.
This is not me saying that all of the dynamics of rape-hoaxing have change – it is an army of Jew lawyers saying that the dynamics have changed, and that they’re going to do everything in their power to bring a whole new wave of these cases.
There is going to be an entire new industry formed around it. They are going to set up charities to pay for the lawsuits of rape hoaxers. All of these Jew lawyers are going to take the cases for free. Women are going to be encouraged by organizations, the state, their therapists and church clergy to press charges and have men thrown in prison.
In my expert advice, you should seriously consider not ever having sex in America ever again.
We need to organize a strike.
We men need to get together and simply say that we refuse to participate in this charade. We are human beings.
Woman Hoaxes Rape After Her Boyfriend Finds Out About Affair http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/woman-hoaxes-rape-after-her-boyfriend-finds-ou...
This is an outrage.
You’re supposed to believe women.
But we’re told this woman was lying, so we shouldn’t believe her?
I only ever heard “believe women.” I never heard “check to see if what she is saying is true or not.”
The fact that a woman is lying DOES NOT mean that we shouldn’t believe her.
Navy Times:
https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2020/02/25/woman-pleads-guilty-to-l... A Virginia woman who accused a sailor of raping her has now admitted the rape never occurred, according to a recent court filing and a U.S. Department of Justice statement. She accused him of the crime in case her “significant other” found out about their affair. ...
participants (2)
-
Zenaan Harkness -
Zig the N.g