We're tweeting these posts. Blowback: is any evidence available to support the narrative? Sample of the data, say, for close examination, with credible provenance, not the GG secret pact bloviation. Mild critique: is this sci-fi or legit or both, advancing the literary-video prize winning breaking news big screen Hollywood Neal Stephenson spirit of the Snowden "NSA disclosures." At 09:54 AM 6/11/2015, you wrote:

More specifics on the sigint system:

This looks like a "Growth Industry" ...

Access to the beam is not restricted, anyone can pull signals out of the reconaissance loop from any of its exposed vectors.***

Viable areas: Terrestrial: a: Spurrious emissions from tubes or conduit, beam deflection from interior particles b: Stray beams passing through field coils but not redirected c: Direct access to tubes or conduit (any variety of methods) Orbital: d: Geo-Magnetic Shift (downlinks) e: Refractive / deflection (downlinks)

As the rate of geo-magnetic shift continues to deform the containment of the projected fields used to shape and steer the beams (which may also have something to do with the sensor itself?), wider areas will be accessible which are hit with the rogue spot beam from orbital (and projected field electro-magnetic) guides.

This means almost anyone with a sensor can gather data from the downlinks.

Additionally, spurrious radiation from the terrestrial system is available around endpoints and field coils, especially from damaged conduit or particles in the tubes.

Time to raid the libraries for antique books about 1800s-1980s X-Ray EM physics and electromagnetic wave guides!

It would not be rational to encode the carrier signal unless it was certain that the encoding would not disrupt signals quality, however raw X-Rated signals might have been too risky?

[There are Thz ring oscillators, detectors, and various photonic rings, but properly implemented field-effect lenses, EM field vector control circuitry and coils(/phased array) (abstract field projection), and optimal tube design are all that should theorhetically be needed once a rogue beam is identified. X-Ray Materials and interference fields must be researched and made common knowledge.]

Hopefully the data source is not too easily found and the dumps get out, this is extremely relevant for "civil liberties", human rights, and reconstructing your own personal history and records where your data is otherwise mising.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, Wilfred Guerin <wilfred@vt.edu> wrote:

...

Helmholtz Tube, Beam Steering, EM field interaction, simple field dynamics, (and your oscilliscope) are all you need to create complex EM signals processors.

No different than your antique crypto cracker, which uses an abstract field to solve complex pre-defined systems. "56-bit" https cracker was mass implemented as a 300mhz backplane EM field solver about the size of your desktop computer.

Using the same technology, resolution, and methods, BTC Bitcoins are around 8m^3 of field to solve.

No doubt the access and decoding to these sigint signals requires similar proessing before being steered to the digitiser.

(Maxwell Tube, Helmholtz Tube, typical of high school physics classrooms)