No Recusal Needed After Clerk Barred From Cases, Panel Rules <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/2286734?nl_pk=87c9365b-e736-431a-87d3-d121d8acafcf&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2025-01-22&read_main=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=3> By P.J. D'Annunzio The Pennsylvania Superior Court backed the rejection of the Cumberland County District Attorney's Office's request that the county president judge be excluded from hearing all criminal cases because of his law clerk's alleged aggressiveness toward attorneys, reasoning there was nothing in the record to show that the judge was biased. Opinion attached | Read full article » <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/2286734?nl_pk=87c9365b-e736-431a-87d3-d121d8acafcf&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2025-01-22&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=3> | Save to favorites » <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/2286734?nl_pk=87c9365b-e736-431a-87d3-d121d8acafcf&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2025-01-22&read_later=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=3>