On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 5:22 AM, James A. Donald wrote:

I cannot see how this impairs my rights, or anyone's rights, other than the right of invaders who hope to invade, kill me and take my stuff.

Many 'laws" around the world should not be interpreted by what they claim to do on the tin and for the near term, but by what they can do when grossly twisted by those who would wield them against you later. Time and again this holds true. Few have learned that, thus they continue to lose. It's time for something different.

I come in and go out by airport, where I already get survielled, so this does not affect me in the slightest. In only affects people who are swimming the Rio Grande and suchlike.

That's exactly what you and most sheeple said about the "law" that was drafted and enacted to "get you surveilled", and the "law" before that, and before that, etc.

On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 10:40 PM, James A. Donald wrote:

One such man is just a criminal, but when he is backed and supported by other men in this common purpose, as he is, and thus enjoys immunity and impunity through this mutual support for violent men engaged in violent acts, he is an invasion, part of an invading army.

Invaders, as one or many, and unless exceptionally strong, prey upon the availability of the weak. Walls, borders, as single physical points perhaps, and certainly leaving multitude holes for easy access to the still unstrengthened existing masses of weak lambs / sheeple. However raising the all the weak individually, independantly mutually communally, to be self defensive, the raising of such an inhospitable environment to successful attack, rendering the first would be exploiters back from whence they came with a message of costly odds... this has not been tried, and all else has failed (those who claim to be your saviours, often aren't, or at least can't or are unwilling to prove it). The US is an example, another nation state would be batshit insane to try physically invading it due to the distributed prevalence of firearms, they only way they could win is to erase it with nukes and reboot it, or psyop the sheeple with claims of being their Messiah. Here's one link to the case, is it Mexico invading, or random snaps and issues across and part of all humanity... https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kate-steinle-trial-jose-ines-garcia-zarate-not-... What happens when Mexico is "invaded"...

Surveillance, patrol, walls

May end up operating like centralized egress filters and 1984, often before those who built them are dead. https://papersplease.org/ https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84 https://wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_world https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Gates_of_Alexander “The modern Chinese have done what people for centuries were embarrassed to do and what the invaders could not do, the wall is being destroyed by the hands of the descendants.” https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Wall https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment

On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:04 AM, juan wrote:

...

to try physically invading US

lawl - what the fuck are you talking about

You could probably find winning and losing scenaries searches like... https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=invading+america Doesn't matter, whether due to internal and or external reasons, all fail in time. Maybe people will learn. Or not. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6b70TUbdfs Too bad they forgot about how to handling the tiny dot.

On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 1:15 PM, juan wrote:

invaders? mexicans or europeans

Body counts left in their wake should answer that.

On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:58:16 -0500 grarpamp wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6b70TUbdfs Too bad they forgot about how to handling the tiny dot.

wow - that's motherfuckinly retarded - can't people THINK before posting. grarpamp you've linked yet another piece of garbage the people who call themselves "the americunt government" ARE NOT A TINY DOT. THEY ARE NOT A 'TINY" % of the number of 'taxpayers' at all. Do your fucking homework and learn how many TENS OF MILLIONS of parasites there are. here's a start : http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-veterans-numbers/story?id=14928136 Those Who Have Served : 22,658,000 (murdering non-joo-kristian brwon children) Those in Uniform Right Now : 2,317,761 then you need to add the cops, then you need to add millions of bureaucrats in thousands of 'departments', and the millions of cunts from public 'education'. then you need to add all the government 'contractors'. et cetera

On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 13:47:13 -0500 grarpamp wrote:

...

...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6b70TUbdfs

...

then you need to add the ... then you need to add millions of ... and the millions of cunts from ... then you need to add all the...

Yes, the entire world is infested with vermin and retards,

so why do you post factually wrong garbage?

including the self proclaimed special ones making up the tiny dots. What is your solution to that problem?

On 12/26/2017 9:23 AM, grarpamp wrote:

What is your solution?

While one should avoid war with outgroups, (rule of acquisition thirty five) takes two to avoid war. Democratic party policy is to hike tribalism up to the max, to have integration but resist assimilation. This is a program bound to end in war, democide, and genocide. Assimilation works, integration does not. If two tribes occupy overlapping territories, either war will ensue, or one will rule, and the other be second class and forced into submissive posture. That is human nature. Since tribalism is also human nature, need borders with walls backed by men with guns. The peace of Westphalia is a general formula for peace between Kings, nations, peoples, cultures, tribes, and religions. This social technology, one of Chesterton's many abandoned fences, needs to be revived and reapplied. Lacking this, we are seeing increasing incidents of casual violence against white males, with those guilty getting away with it, being let off by police and judiciary. This can only escalate. One tribe must rule, one must submit. The Democratic Party prescription is a prescription for genocidal and democidal war, and that war is beginning. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

The truth is important. Which begs at every point in time, which is more valuable?... Continuing to refine relatively small discontinuities in the knowledge of a few disciples of truth (verily decentralized Messiahs might they become), or going forward out to the masses, now, within one's own lifetime, such that the sheepledom might begin a much larger, earlier, shift toward truth, from their starting point of zero before?

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 04:18:05 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote:

On 12/26/2017 2:04 AM, juan wrote:

...

what the fuck are you talking about? The piece of right wing shit james donald is the invader. He and the rest of european shit who invaded america are the invaders.

Which implies that you, having some South American Indian blood, should kill us and take (back) our stuff.

a piece of shit like you surely deserves to be beaten to death - as to 'your' stuff, it's not yours since it's the result of anti-free-market looting. but that's not really the point here - the point is that you scum are the invaders. a related point is : why does an utter anti-libertarian fascist like you pose as even pseudo 'libertarian' 'cpunk'? Your natural habitat is the KKK.

Before we came, your ancestors were eating each other. You did not have the wheel, you failed to domesticate the sheep, the goat, or the buffalo.

You don't actually have the competence or social cohesion to cause us problems, except that the democrats have created a alliance of low and high against middle, and alliance of far against near, and this alliance is run by white people, as is obvious from photographs of the "hispanics" exercising power in that alliance. When you take over that alliance, when high gets full of people affirmative actioned into positions of power, you will wind up eating the people who organized your alliance, eating those few remaining (mostly Jewish) democrats who are still competent. Brown Berniedette will eat the Clintons and Bernie.

When the decadent Spanish let south America go, it fell apart, and order was restored by the power of the USA, and to a lesser extent by Soviet power. If the confederacy had won the war of Northern Aggression, it then would have replaced the Spaniards in South America.

All wars are white on white wars. Whites fight over other peoples, not with them. Only the East Asians are competent in war, and they are still nowhere near as good at it as whites. The Vietnam war was not really whites versus East Asians, it was really the blue empire of the consulates versus the red empire of the bases. The Vietnamese were Soviet proxies, and the Soviets were blue empire proxies. Without Soviet backing, State Department backing, and Democratic Party backing, the Vietnamese would have been toast.

So bring it on. It will end the way it did last time.

--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 05:56:52 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote:

On 12/26/2017 5:01 AM, juan wrote:

...

a piece of shit like you surely deserves to be beaten to death - as to 'your' stuff, it's not yours since it's the result of anti-free-market looting.

Pretty sure you have the same evidence that any white person's stuff is the result of looting as you have that my stuff is the result of looting.

tell me about lysander spooner

Also, the Clinton's stuff and Bernie's stuff actually is the result of looting, so chances are that the holiness spiral in the Democrats will result in you eating the people who are competent to organize you to take my stuff.

--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 04:56:16 +1000 "James A. Donald" wrote:

On 12/26/2017 2:04 AM, juan wrote:

...

what the fuck are you talking about? The piece of right wing shit james donald is the invader. He and the rest of european shit who invaded america are the invaders.

The alliance between La Raza, Black Lives Matter, and the Democrats,

except the americunt "democrats" are exactly the same kind of right wing nazi you are. Only a monkey like you would fail to understand the fact that the US is ruled by One Party. Or would be stupid enough to pretend that he's not 99% in agreement with the "democrats" - remember fucktard, the 'democrats' are the pro-slavery southern party - your party.

resembles the alliance between the Populares and the Samnites.

The Populares and the Optimates were political parties in Roman Empire, "Populare" meaning "People's party" The Populares corresponded to today's Democrats, the coalition of the fringes, weirdoes versus normal people, minorities versus the majority, the coalition of high and low against middle.

The Populares wanted to give the Samnites (equivalent to today's La Raza) a fairer deal within the Roman Empire.

The Samnites wanted to level the walls of Rome, kill all male Romans, and enslave all Roman women.

When civil war between the political parties, between the Optimates and the Populares ensued, the alliance between Populares and Samnites proved less than entirely helpful.

--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus