[ot][spam][crazy][personal] Resistance: Nodes
My freshman year of college, before leaving, I spent some months in a state of mind where I was writing a data backend, planning to use it for an AI to problem solve and self-describe. I didn't know much of what I was doing, hadn't taken any classes in AI, I was into plants and mythology and whatnot. The flexible database I created has a normative name, I don't remember what it is. It's roughly similar to the opencog structures. Anyway, the idea is so general that the inhibition of it inhibits a lot of other things for me. It is incredibly hard for me to make a use a library for graph nodes with arbitrary tagged edges on them. The word "node" is inhibiting for me. One of the issues is that, after starting this for the purpose of an AI, I used the concepts to simplify and notate my thoughts, internally, and also on paper occasionally for hard concepts. So the inhibitions engage both cognition and power.
Simplify: the reason I want to do this now, is I'm in a state of mind where it would be really nice to make a logical system that just expresses true simple things. A logical system that has generality would need a way of representing relations between things that can be operated on. My inhibitions seem to roughly equate it to the node concern, for me.
Here's one simple approach: - a node is a collection of edges to other nodes - each edge is a triplet (or, an n-tuplet) - the nodes on the edge represent the meaning of the edge
class BasicNode(dict): # norm: keys are edge types, values are edge destinations pass A = BasicNode() B = BasicNode({A:A}) let's see if it works
B = BasicNode({A:A}) TypeError: unhashable type: 'BasicNode' ok. so quick-dict-approach only works if the edges are translated to strings or numbers or such
the goal is to use a reusable library to do this to express a simple logical concept such as "addition is an operator", "one is a number", "true is true", something simple.
the reason for this is the lack of rationality in my world. i need something that is rational. i'm used to writing software. a program that expresses something simple and rational would not be complex.
participants (1)
-
Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of Many