Thanks coderman! On 6/16/21 1:32 AM, coderman wrote:

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Monday, June 14, 2021 3:50 AM, Douglas Lucas <dal@riseup.net> wrote: ...

...

Anyway, this latest entry to my blog is at: https://douglaslucas.com/blog/2021/06/13/foias-executive-function/

hello Doug!

you mention,

...

Now I’m confronting the confusing question of whether I can appeal them at all, since some laws/policies require appeals to be filed within, say, 90 days of the adverse determination. I’ve missed many of those deadlines, and I’m currently trying to figure out if I have to start completely over with brand new filings on the same subject matters. But then, can’t the agency just say the new filing is denied because it’s identical to the past filing that was denied? Yet would that still open up a new 90-day window for an appeal? In any case, I don’t want to end up waiting years and years again between my new request and the new adverse determination. I’ll ask the MuckRock experts for help on appealing.

i am in the same boat, and in fact there is a long record of federal agencies using silent denials ("we sent it, we promise") to force the timeout on appeals for denied requests.

you will have to submit a *new* request, which will be denied, and you'll want to watch it, because again, they don't always send proper notifications.

once you see the denial come across, file the appeal, and specifically state how their claimed exemptions don't apply. E.g. this is in the public interest, this subject is no longer sensitive, etc.

good luck! :)

best regards,

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 9:32 PM grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCIgn8ed-tw MDR - Mandatory Declassification Review

⭐️

Few know about it, many should be using it more.

Dig deeper.

-- <https://about.me/carimachet?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb> cari machet about.me/carimachet <https://about.me/carimachet?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>

Humans nature is to deliver works... https://vimeo.com/52376938 Signs from Occupy

Here is an example of an MDR in progress that has a lot of support and publicity behind it... https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/obloq0/my_effort_to_get_the_classifie...

Let’s discuss your plan(s) and the execution(s) of your plan(s) Tell us wise one I am not being sarcastic I am actually wondering On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:31 AM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:

...

your appeal to other foxes guarding the same general henhouse may be unlikely to succeed,

...

Once the appeals process fails, you then file a lawsuit, asking the judicial branch (basic separation-of-powers bullshit) to step in and overrule the executive branch or legislative branch agency you’re contending with. Because this process can take years and be expensive if lawyers are required, it prevents a lot of important information from being released and entering the news cycle.

So you, like anybody else with half a brain, know that the system is a scam.

To make the self-parody even more hilarious, the useless stuff the govt 'releases' is in turn 90% censored!!! Maybe when you get your 'pdf' all covered in black, you can fill a ... what? LMAO!

So now let's look at the people(i.e. you) who use this govt 'service'. What journos like you are doing is wasting time begging your masters/accomplices for bits of PROPAGANDA to publish. You're publishing US govt propaganda while playing the govt game of pretending that your idiotic bullshit entails 'freedom of information'

What you are actually working for of course, is freedom FROM information.

bottom line Dougles, you're a good, loyal, govcorp boy. (as clearly proven also by your previous, revolting radical feminazi vomits).

--

<https://about.me/carimachet?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb> cari machet about.me/carimachet <https://about.me/carimachet?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>

Maybe you can ad onto my and Nietzsche’s plan

...

...

...

...

When you get a chance check out this newly published report for Jeremy Hammond https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3809358 On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 5:05 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:13:58 -0500 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Let’s discuss your plan(s) and the execution(s) of your plan(s)

Tell us wise one

I am not being sarcastic I am actually wondering

I don't have a plan. I could blow up things by myself but I wouldn't get too far. There's no point in having a plan unless there's a reasonably sized group of people who know what they are talking about and can carry the plan out.

Sorry to disappoint you =P

-- <https://about.me/carimachet?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb> cari machet about.me/carimachet <https://about.me/carimachet?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>

What is needed to resolve the larger problem?

Thanks karl. To solve the problem of JS malware what's needed is to nuke 'the web'.