I came across this the other day: /"This paper presents a proposal of a new P2P microblogging platform that is scalable, resilient to failures and attacks, does not depend on any central authority for user registration, provides easy-to-use encrypted private communication and authenticated public posts. The architecture tries to leverage from existing and proven P2P technologies such as Bittorrent and Bitcoin as much possible. Privacy is also one of the primary design concerns, no one should be able to see the user's IP or their followers unless he explicitly shares such information. The proposed platform is comprised of three mostly independent overlay networks. The first provides distributed user registration and authentication and is based on the Bitcoin protocol. The second one is a Distributed Hash Table (DHT) overlay network providing key/value storage for user resources and tracker location for the third network. The last network is a collection of possibly disjoint "swarms" of followers, based on the Bittorrent protocol, which can be used for efficient near-instant notification delivery to many users. [...] "/ -- "twister - a P2P microblogging platform <http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.7152v1.pdf>", Miguel Freitas Personally, I'm impressed by the creative application of Bitcoin/Bitorrent/DHT protocols to the problem of private/anonymous communication ... and the software looks very clean and usable as well. I also like that it's based on P2P technology unlike solutions such as Diaspora, which still require trusting third parties with personal data ... Thoughts? --Jesse Taylor <http://www.interference.cc>
Dnia sobota, 11 stycznia 2014 12:24:59 Jesse Taylor pisze:
I came across this the other day:
/" [...] "/
-- "twister - a P2P microblogging platform <http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.7152v1.pdf>", Miguel Freitas
Personally, I'm impressed by the creative application of Bitcoin/Bitorrent/DHT protocols to the problem of private/anonymous communication ... and the software looks very clean and usable as well. I also like that it's based on P2P technology unlike solutions such as Diaspora, which still require trusting third parties with personal data ...
Yeah, I always said Diaspora, StatusNet/GNU Social et al are just a stepping stone to get people out of walled gardens and then one day move to pure p2p services.
Thoughts?
One: please tell me it would be possible to have a compatibility layer between this and Diaspora/Friendica/GNU Social, so that users don't have to choose either-or. -- Pozdr rysiek
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 10:55:53AM +0100, rysiek wrote:
Thoughts?
One: please tell me it would be possible to have a compatibility layer between this and Diaspora/Friendica/GNU Social, so that users don't have to choose either-or.
i'd like to encourage all (especially non-coder) contributors to the noise^Wmailing-list to actually direct their surplus energies into writing RFCs standardizing such things. -- pgp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/stef.gpg pgp fp: FD52 DABD 5224 7F9C 63C6 3C12 FC97 D29F CA05 57EF otr fp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/otr.txt
participants (3)
-
Jesse Taylor
-
rysiek
-
stef