Fwd: [cryptome] Wifi Hotspots Must have Users Identity and Password
How nice... Enjoy.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: douglas rankine <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org> Date: 2016-09-17 13:14 GMT+03:00 Subject: [cryptome] Wifi Hotspots Must have Users Identity and Password To: Cryptome Mailing List <cryptome@freelists.org>
European Court Judgement. Death of Wifi Hotspots. Copyright protection is more important and of a higher priority, than individual privacy, or anonymity.
You vill reveal your identity...the state commands it. Your rights vill be protected. The state vill protect your rights. The state vill love you, hass alvays loved you...and vill continue to love you...and efen more...your information and metadata...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/2016 06:20 AM, Александр wrote:
How nice... Enjoy.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: douglas rankine <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org <mailto:dmarc-noreply@freelists.org>> Date: 2016-09-17 13:14 GMT+03:00 Subject: [cryptome] Wifi Hotspots Must have Users Identity and Password To: Cryptome Mailing List <cryptome@freelists.org <mailto:cryptome@freelists.org>>
see url: https://regmedia.co.uk/2016/09/15/cp160099.pdf <https://regmedia.co.uk/2016/09/15/cp160099.pdf>
European Court Judgement. Death of Wifi Hotspots. Copyright protection is more important and of a higher priority, than individual privacy, or anonymity.
You vill reveal your identity...the state commands it. Your rights vill be protected. The state vill protect your rights. The state vill love you, hass alvays loved you...and vill continue to love you...and efen more...your information and metadata...
Oh well. When opsec demands, there's always the test ports on random residential and commercial cable modems. Hardwired connections also prevent hazardous RF emissions from adding to the EM smog... :o) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJX3SJMAAoJEECU6c5XzmuqIpMH+gKFVuJA7YDqggSi448/Xfwu fL8mUkDZX8FtXbCQ/FeW9OI1KZyYmYsoM5eS0LVd3xdpk2cWH0JfcPg3CgOzb2gE PL8Bi0d6tU5PihmIoh/U+cVOXQr8GMLxtsLt9v7pCu5J3zIU1PRZo2GZWh51C5xn 8KsRziuCR+UC+Y1WrBXAUR1SIttEBHY4wEccikY0Nh1G9y3DtaAnP+YuhuUHqUTp q9UAV75vlBQTftJ3wyZhWhCf6fwgJl9kM9F+bX84Hpl8J/E7N7ADI+a/aNBPJdm3 d8oupE30qQfQ59mlPFK75JDZRVk7vGVLjUtJJubB0+O06935mTA6kluHj/5jqHE= =eTwJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Can the name of the network be "Password is password"? From: Александр <afalex169@gmail.com> To: CypherPunks <cypherpunks@cpunks.org> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 3:20 AM Subject: Fwd: [cryptome] Wifi Hotspots Must have Users Identity and Password How nice... Enjoy.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: douglas rankine <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org> Date: 2016-09-17 13:14 GMT+03:00 Subject: [cryptome] Wifi Hotspots Must have Users Identity and Password To: Cryptome Mailing List <cryptome@freelists.org>
see url: https://regmedia.co.uk/2016/ 09/15/cp160099.pdf
European Court Judgement. Death of Wifi Hotspots. Copyright protection is more important and of a higher priority, than individual privacy, or anonymity.
You vill reveal your identity...the state commands it. Your rights vill be protected. The state vill protect your rights. The state vill love you, hass alvays loved you...and vill continue to love you...and efen more...your information and metadata...
2016-09-17 21:06 GMT+03:00 jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com>:
Can the name of the network be "Password is password"?
Hold a second, Jim...i'm on the phone with the senior judge from the European Court now. Well, the judge says <<Yeah. the name of the network could also be "FuckTheState">>, he claims. <<The only condition is.... to REVEAL it to the state. In the "rest" - you are totally fRRRee! :)>>
From: Александр <afalex169@gmail.com> 2016-09-17 21:06 GMT+03:00 jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com>: Can the name of the network be "Password is password"?
Hold a second, Jim...i'm on the phone with the senior judge from the European Court now. Well, the judge says <<Yeah. the name of the network could also be "FuckTheState">>, he claims. <<The only condition is.... to REVEAL it to the state. In the "rest" - you are totally fRRRee! :)>> I think it's unfortunate that people can't "automatically" share some of their (otherwise unused) WiFi capacity. Many people would do this, as long as a few restrictions are in place: 1. A person sharing shouldn't be legally liable for anything done; 2. The owner gets to use "all" of the capacity when needed; the external user only gets space when available. 3. The IP addresses of "his" use and that of the "external" use be unrelated in any way. Interestingly, Comcast/Xfinity has a somewhat automatic system of this kind: Boxes are called "gateways" and, in effect, have two WiFi routers: One for the owner and the other for anyone else. (However, to use the other side, you need to be a subscriber somewhere or have his password/permission.) For news of an objection to this, see: https://www.fastcompany.com/3039682/comcast-was-sued-for-quietly-making-your... Jim Bell
participants (3)
-
jim bell -
Steve Kinney -
Александр