Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Fri, Apr 26, 2024, 4:30 AM Subject: Fwd: Inquiry To: <cypherpunks@cpunks.org> ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Sun, Jun 2, 2024, 7:52 AM Subject: Fwd: Inquiry To: <cypherpunks@cpunks.org> Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Thank you, Roberta! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:43 AM Subject: Re: Inquiry To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> Cc: Stephanie Lake <slake@kaplanhecker.com> Okay. Thank you for letting me know. Gunnar On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this. ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Roberta:
Thank you for your response.
I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am on the other side of it all.
It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we worked together.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thank you,
Gunnar ---
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-un...
Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various legal entanglements.
According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for defending United States independence from international litigation investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
Happy to talk. What is the matter? ------------------------------ *From:* Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com> *Subject:* Inquiry
You don't often get email from g@xny.io. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
Ms. Kaplan:
My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
Thank you,
Gunnar -- Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G@xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
------------------------------ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
participants (1)
-
Gunnar Larson