Fwd: Climate change - Antarctic ice cover hits record highs, last 3 yrs in a row
Zenaan, The question isn't whether the earth's climate is changing. It is. Its always changing. The question is whether, as many scientist contend, its mainly induced by human activity and MORE importantly whether these scientist can prove they are correct SCIENTIFICALLY or can they only offer their CONSENSUS. According to Michael Crichton, they can't prove it for the simple reason they cannot use a key element of "the scientific method", controlled, repeatable, experiments as is common in all "hard" sciences. http://www.s8int.com/crichton.html Consensus is not science, its politics. Science has nothing to do with Consensus. Steve On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
The following is a link packed, quote worthy, numbers filled article for your reading and forwarding pleasure :)
With Ice Growing at Both Poles, Global Warming Theories Implode http://principia-scientific.org/ice-growing-poles-global-war ming-theories-implode/
From: Steven Schear <schear.steve@gmail.com> To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 10:40 AM Subject: Fwd: Climate change - Antarctic ice cover hits record highs, last 3 yrs in a row
Zenaan, The question isn't whether the earth's climate is changing. It is. Its always changing. The question is whether, as many scientist contend, its >mainly induced by human activity and MORE importantly whether these scientist can prove they are correct SCIENTIFICALLY or can they only >offer their CONSENSUS. According to Michael Crichton, they can't prove it for the simple reason they cannot use a key element of "the scientific >method", controlled, repeatable, experiments as is common in all "hard" sciences. http://www.s8int.com/crichton. html
Absolutely correct. That is why we have to resort to computer models. But those are apparently very complicated, and they don't necessarily provide useful, accurate results yet. Improving those computer models is an ongoing process. Presumably, they will eventually match reality sufficiently well to be useful. Probably not yet. Fortunately, the SO2 injection technique will probably, and simply, counteract whatever increases in CO2 that are likely to occur in the future. Jim Bell
participants (2)
-
jim bell -
Steven Schear