Parasites on Parade - New book by Larken Rose https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxR1tNTGlww https://www.amazon.com/Parasites-Parade-Larken-Rose/dp/1092138285 Dealing with Pedophilia in an Anarchist Society with Yaakov Markel via Anarchast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NWLFBHrWdU This Freedom Thing Is Way More Complicated Than I Thought - Anarchizona Keynote by Berwick https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt4vrQXP7tw https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=anarchizona JW Weatherman Bitcoin Q&A w 10HoursofBitcoin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgkUnsB1kjg What Is The A.R.K. & How To Get It w Mark Passio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsKe6kmqlAM https://www.whatonearthishappening.com/ark What On Earth Is Happening Ep 204 - How To Find Occulted Information In The Era Of Internet Censorship https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_m0qC0P1B8 The Only True Solution - Natural Law w Mark Passio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttqCyJ3Gcew https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8c4f-FGx7c Amazon Book Burning - More Books Get Censored https://www.tr.news/amazon-on-a-book-burning-spree/ Border Control https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGmcFqRhN1I Quit Your Government Jobs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asr7Jqs0tIs https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=quit+your+government+job Statist Finds Out He's An Anarchist - Larken Rose & Hodey Johns https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpYZZafQOPM Statist Power Vacuum Fail https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLomFbTVzWo Your Right to Film the Police - Ford Fischer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fno7GBXJbto "We Will Not Comply" Rally for Gun Rights v Antifa in Ohio,US https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaa5rkcW0ZI
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:50:18 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Dealing with Pedophilia in an Anarchist Society with Yaakov Markel via Anarchast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NWLFBHrWdU
1) There are no 'age of consent' 'laws' under libertarian philosophy and 'children' have the same rights that so called 'adults' have. 2) children have sexual impulses like any other human being - which is the reason why children "play doctor" among other things. The conclusion from those two *facts* of life should be obvious to anyone with half a brain, and that of course *excludes* typical 'anarcho' fascist scum like berwick and this jakobo markel nazi. As to the content of that 'talk' : We have jakobo markel equating 'pedophilia' with 'child molesters'(whatever that means), and wanting to *chemically castrate* 'pedophiles'. That's extremely funny because not even the current statist scum from the 'official' government is as deranged as these 'libertarian' monkeys straight out from the dark ages. Second extremely funny thing is : jakobo believes that people in 'his' 'free society' will either be 'insured' or will be unable to even buy food. In other words, the 'free society' these people envision is way more totalitarian than the current statist system. And that wouldn't apply only to 'pedophiles' but to anyone who isn't a piece of nazi scum like 'them' and who didn't obey the 'rules' of the 'community'. OOPS, what we have is actually a bunch of totalitarian commies. Who would have thought... Then we have psycho berwick stating that if a 'pedophile' was summarily executed by a neighboor ('pedophile's head blown off by a gun in berwick's words) then berwick would "have lunch" with the murderer. So to these people outright MURDER is not a crime at all, whereas consensual acts between people are. Anyway thanks grarpamp for linking yet more proof as to the anti-libertarian, fascist nature of scum like berwick and his 'associates' - then again, if you want to know what the worst possible kind of right winger looks like, just listen to anglo-jew-american scum posing as 'libertarian'.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:50:18 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Dealing with Pedophilia in an Anarchist Society with Yaakov Markel via Anarchast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NWLFBHrWdU
of course, another quite remarkable thing is how this two scumbags parrot to the tee the current psychobabble 'scientific' dogmas about 'therapists', 'trauma' and the like. so here's a half sane voice to counter these 'libertarians'. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7633118-the-trauma-myth " psychologist Susan Clancy reports on years of research and contends that it is not the abuse* itself that causes trauma—but rather the narrative that is later imposed on the abuse experience." go figure. It's all just...propaganda from monkeys and their puritan, anti-sex (non) 'culture' based on jew-kkkristian (non) 'values'. *there of course is no 'abuse' in consensual acts.
On 4/10/19 4:03 PM, Punk wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:50:18 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Dealing with Pedophilia in an Anarchist Society with Yaakov Markel via Anarchast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NWLFBHrWdU
of course, another quite remarkable thing is how this two scumbags parrot to the tee the current psychobabble 'scientific' dogmas about 'therapists', 'trauma' and the like.
so here's a half sane voice to counter these 'libertarians'.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7633118-the-trauma-myth
" psychologist Susan Clancy reports on years of research and contends that it is not the abuse* itself that causes trauma—but rather the narrative that is later imposed on the abuse experience."
go figure. It's all just...propaganda from monkeys and their puritan, anti-sex (non) 'culture' based on jew-kkkristian (non) 'values'.
*there of course is no 'abuse' in consensual acts.
The inherent logical disconnect between anarchy and law enforcement underlines the irrelevance of /most/ debate about how an anarchist society should be run. I prefer what used to be called frontier justice: When someone makes enough trouble to motivate enough people to do something about it, they act: Maybe a good talking-to; if that fails to curb the behavior in question, maybe running the offender out of town; if that seems inadequate to protect the community, maybe killing the bastard. Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have. Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating tort claims, on a level playing field where wealth, power, and political prejudice provide no advantages, can exist. :o)
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:02:02 -0400 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
The inherent logical disconnect between anarchy and law enforcement underlines the irrelevance of /most/ debate about how an anarchist society should be run.
Learning what lunatics like berwick and co. think is valuable. And the idea that they are representatives of anarchist philosophy is of course completely laughable.
I prefer what used to be called frontier justice: When someone makes enough trouble to motivate enough people to do something about it, they act: Maybe a good talking-to; if that fails to curb the behavior in question, maybe running the offender out of town; if that seems inadequate to protect the community, maybe killing the bastard.
Who are you planning to kill, exactly? And what sort of 'crime' gets you first a 'talk' and then gets you murdered? Not sure how any of your comments addresses any of the points I made.
Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have.
Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating tort claims,
yeah but not the point at hand. And anarchy isn't frontier 'justice' either. Whatever you mean by 'justice'.
on a level playing field where wealth, power, and political prejudice provide no advantages, can exist.
:o)
On 4/10/19 8:29 PM, Punk wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:02:02 -0400 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
The inherent logical disconnect between anarchy and law enforcement underlines the irrelevance of /most/ debate about how an anarchist society should be run.
Learning what lunatics like berwick and co. think is valuable. And the idea that they are representatives of anarchist philosophy is of course completely laughable.
I prefer what used to be called frontier justice: When someone makes enough trouble to motivate enough people to do something about it, they act: Maybe a good talking-to; if that fails to curb the behavior in question, maybe running the offender out of town; if that seems inadequate to protect the community, maybe killing the bastard.
Who are you planning to kill, exactly? And what sort of 'crime' gets you first a 'talk' and then gets you murdered? Not sure how any of your comments addresses any of the points I made.
Nobody 'tall. But any society /will/ act to protect itself against people who exhibit chronic violent behavior - with exceptions where civilized societies reward that behavior so long as it serves the purposes of the worst offenders, its ruling class.
Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have.
Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating tort claims,
yeah but not the point at hand. And anarchy isn't frontier 'justice' either. Whatever you mean by 'justice'.
Anarchy simply means the absence of a social command hierarchy acting through coercive means. Anarchism denotes theoretical consideration and rhetoric related to defining and implementing (relatively) nonviolent social conventions and behavior. The word "justice" indicates "adjustment." Lao Tzu say: "A man most conversant in the rites acts, but when no one responds, rolls up his sleeves and resorts to persuasion by force." The most typical problems with any idealistic -ism arise when people take abstract ideas literally and try to apply them without consideration of material context in the real world. As guiding principles, abstractions like "anarchy" can deliver a lot of value; but as explicit instructions held to apply universally, they often achieve the exact opposite of their intended results. :o)
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:24:20PM -0400, Steve Kinney wrote:
On 4/10/19 8:29 PM, Punk wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:02:02 -0400 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
The inherent logical disconnect between anarchy and law enforcement underlines the irrelevance of /most/ debate about how an anarchist society should be run.
Learning what lunatics like berwick and co. think is valuable. And the idea that they are representatives of anarchist philosophy is of course completely laughable.
I prefer what used to be called frontier justice: When someone makes enough trouble to motivate enough people to do something about it, they act: Maybe a good talking-to; if that fails to curb the behavior in question, maybe running the offender out of town; if that seems inadequate to protect the community, maybe killing the bastard.
Who are you planning to kill, exactly? And what sort of 'crime' gets you first a 'talk' and then gets you murdered? Not sure how any of your comments addresses any of the points I made.
Nobody 'tall. But any society /will/ act to protect itself against people who exhibit chronic violent behavior - with exceptions where civilized societies reward that behavior so long as it serves the purposes of the worst offenders, its ruling class.
Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have.
Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating tort claims,
yeah but not the point at hand. And anarchy isn't frontier 'justice' either. Whatever you mean by 'justice'.
Anarchy simply means the absence of a social command hierarchy acting through coercive means. Anarchism denotes theoretical consideration and rhetoric related to defining and implementing (relatively) nonviolent social conventions and behavior.
The word "justice" indicates "adjustment."
Lao Tzu say: "A man most conversant in the rites acts, but when no one responds, rolls up his sleeves and resorts to persuasion by force."
The most typical problems with any idealistic -ism arise when people take abstract ideas literally and try to apply them without consideration of material context in the real world. As guiding principles, abstractions like "anarchy" can deliver a lot of value; but as explicit instructions held to apply universally, they often achieve the exact opposite of their intended results.
Reminder of the town of anarchy: [ANARCHY] Town posts armed guards to stop contraband entry https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2018-July/042502.html A Mexican Town Overthrew Their Local Government And Things Are Going Great https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-02/mexican-town-overthrew-their-local... The town of Cherán, Mexico was once plagued… Cherán is now run by autonomous groups of armed individuals… members of an autonomous militia — guard every entrance to the town, looking for strangers with contraband… “Contraband” would be considered political propaganda posters of those who claim the right to rule other human beings. …Cherán has achieved something unthinkable in Michoacán: a dramatic drop in murder rates, with rates for other serious crimes hovering at nearly zero. For those in Mexico, especially in an election year marred by wanton political murders, Cherán stands as proof that, in the country’s entrenched cycle of violence, the key ingredient to that violence is the state.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:24:20 -0400 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
Who are you planning to kill, exactly? And what sort of 'crime' gets you first a 'talk' and then gets you murdered? Not sure how any of your comments addresses any of the points I made.
Nobody 'tall. But any society /will/ act to protect itself against people who exhibit chronic violent behavior -
you must be referring to people like berwick and his summary executions of 'pedophiles'? By the way, I assume that berwick is going to execute children who 'play doctor' too, since such children are, well, 'pedophiles' themselves.
with exceptions where civilized societies reward that behavior so long as it serves the purposes of the worst offenders, its ruling class.
and that such exceptions actually include all 'civilized' societies in which mass murder is completely institutionalized and worshiped. You know, like the western cesspool, especially the USA, etc.
Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have.
Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating tort claims,
yeah but not the point at hand. And anarchy isn't frontier 'justice' either. Whatever you mean by 'justice'.
Anarchy simply means the absence of a social command hierarchy acting through coercive means.
Anarchy means more than that. It means a social order based on voluntary cooperation. And whether interactions are voluntary or not is defined at the individual level. It's also a rationalistic anti-authoritarian philosophy, so it can make a few devastating comments on things like jew-christian theocracy, for instance.
Anarchism denotes theoretical consideration and rhetoric related to defining and implementing (relatively) nonviolent social conventions and behavior.
Not just 'nonviolent' but consensual.
The word "justice" indicates "adjustment."
Nah. The word justice indicates justice =) It's a word stolen from latin "justitia" (spanish justicia). "Adjustment' may come from the same root but it's a derived word and has a different meaning. roman justice was even personified or made into a godess although roman justice was rather flawed. Regardless, the libertarian concept of justice stands. Justice being the state in which personal rights are respected, or restitution for rights violations is paid(to the extent possible)
Lao Tzu say: "A man most conversant in the rites acts, but when no one responds, rolls up his sleeves and resorts to persuasion by force."
The most typical problems with any idealistic -ism arise when people take abstract ideas literally and try to apply them without consideration of material context in the real world. As guiding principles, abstractions like "anarchy" can deliver a lot of value; but as explicit instructions held to apply universally, they often achieve the exact opposite of their intended results.
That's kinda vague? But maybe you are referring to 'anarcho' fascists like berwick and the like? They perfectly fit my previous comments about fake libertarians and true fascists. I bet if you criticize google, amazon and the rest of the NSA, berwick and his pal jakobo would go into hysterical pro-corporate propaganda mode, just like their accomplice, scumbag jeffrey tucker https://mises.org/library/movie-gets-it-right https://allevents.in/acapulco/anarchapulco-2019-with-jeffrey-tucker/20002435... et cetera.
:o)
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:40:09AM -0300, Punk wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:24:20 -0400 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
Who are you planning to kill, exactly? And what sort of 'crime' gets you first a 'talk' and then gets you murdered? Not sure how any of your comments addresses any of the points I made.
Nobody 'tall. But any society /will/ act to protect itself against people who exhibit chronic violent behavior -
you must be referring to people like berwick and his summary executions of 'pedophiles'?
By the way, I assume that berwick is going to execute children who 'play doctor' too, since such children are, well, 'pedophiles' themselves.
with exceptions where civilized societies reward that behavior so long as it serves the purposes of the worst offenders, its ruling class.
and that such exceptions actually include all 'civilized' societies in which mass murder is completely institutionalized and worshiped. You know, like the western cesspool, especially the USA, etc.
Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have.
Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating tort claims,
yeah but not the point at hand. And anarchy isn't frontier 'justice' either. Whatever you mean by 'justice'.
Anarchy simply means the absence of a social command hierarchy acting through coercive means.
Anarchy means more than that. It means a social order based on voluntary cooperation. And whether interactions are voluntary or not is defined at the individual level. It's also a rationalistic anti-authoritarian philosophy, so it can make a few devastating comments on things like jew-christian theocracy, for instance.
Anarchism denotes theoretical consideration and rhetoric related to defining and implementing (relatively) nonviolent social conventions and behavior.
Not just 'nonviolent' but consensual.
Consent is purported or "deemed" to be non-existent for children until the day of their 16th birthday. To "deem" something is to say that that which is, is not what it is, or does not exist when it does exist, or does exist when it does not in fact exist. Deeming is demonic in principle, i.e. enforced/fiat denial of reality. Deeming is for power structures, psychological control or torture, the enforcement of submission to the will of another - "psychological rape" if you will, with the ultimate goal being self-censorship (self psychological rape?) Discussion of childhood sexuality in the present milieu of SJW terrorists, typically leads to superficially cheap and dangerous slurs, ad-homs and calls for murder, since it's all dichomatic black and white certainties and finalities, "one's personal childhood experiences of playing doctor be damned".
The word "justice" indicates "adjustment."
Nah. The word justice indicates justice =) It's a word stolen from latin "justitia" (spanish justicia). "Adjustment' may come from the same root but it's a derived word and has a different meaning.
roman justice was even personified or made into a godess although roman justice was rather flawed. Regardless, the libertarian concept of justice stands. Justice being the state in which personal rights are respected, or restitution for rights violations is paid(to the extent possible)
Lao Tzu say: "A man most conversant in the rites acts, but when no one responds, rolls up his sleeves and resorts to persuasion by force."
The most typical problems with any idealistic -ism arise when people take abstract ideas literally and try to apply them without consideration of material context in the real world. As guiding principles, abstractions like "anarchy" can deliver a lot of value; but as explicit instructions held to apply universally, they often achieve the exact opposite of their intended results.
That's kinda vague? But maybe you are referring to 'anarcho' fascists like berwick and the like? They perfectly fit my previous comments about fake libertarians and true fascists.
I bet if you criticize google, amazon and the rest of the NSA, berwick and his pal jakobo would go into hysterical pro-corporate propaganda mode, just like their accomplice, scumbag jeffrey tucker
https://mises.org/library/movie-gets-it-right
https://allevents.in/acapulco/anarchapulco-2019-with-jeffrey-tucker/20002435...
et cetera.
:o)
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:26:03 +1000 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
Consent is purported or "deemed" to be non-existent for children until the day of their 16th birthday.
...depending on so called 'jurisdiction'. In especially shitty 'jurisdictions' like say many states in the USA cesspool it's 18. In somewhat more civilized countries in europe it's 14. Regardless, people of age 14-18 are NOT 'children'. And, to state the painfully obvious, whehter they consent to sex or to ANY OTHER FUCKING THING has nothing to do with 'law'.
To "deem" something is to say that that which is, is not what it is, or does not exist when it does exist, or does exist when it does not in fact exist.
yeah
Deeming is demonic in principle, i.e. enforced/fiat denial of reality.
Deeming is for power structures, psychological control or torture, the enforcement of submission to the will of another - "psychological rape" if you will, with the ultimate goal being self-censorship (self psychological rape?)
Discussion of childhood sexuality in the present milieu of SJW terrorists,
except, it's not just feminazis. As mentioned once or five times, far right assholes like berwick and the vast majority of 'libertarians' are just as bad or even worse than SJW..
typically leads to superficially cheap and dangerous slurs, ad-homs and calls for murder, since it's all dichomatic black and white certainties and finalities, "one's personal childhood experiences of playing doctor be damned".
On 4/10/19 11:40 PM, Punk wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:24:20 -0400 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
Who are you planning to kill, exactly? And what sort of 'crime' gets you first a 'talk' and then gets you murdered? Not sure how any of your comments addresses any of the points I made.
Nobody 'tall. But any society /will/ act to protect itself against people who exhibit chronic violent behavior -
you must be referring to people like berwick and his summary executions of 'pedophiles'?
By the way, I assume that berwick is going to execute children who 'play doctor' too, since such children are, well, 'pedophiles' themselves.
Spotlights and laughter should cut a guy like this Berwick down to size, where/as required. The beauty part: If a more creative response becomes necessary, the attention already attracted to him would make such a response more practicable.
with exceptions where civilized societies reward that behavior so long as it serves the purposes of the worst offenders, its ruling class.
and that such exceptions actually include all 'civilized' societies in which mass murder is completely institutionalized and worshiped. You know, like the western cesspool, especially the USA, etc.
Of course. I did say "civilization."
Anarchy simply means the absence of a social command hierarchy acting through coercive means.
Anarchy means more than that. It means a social order based on voluntary cooperation. And whether interactions are voluntary or not is defined at the individual level. It's also a rationalistic anti-authoritarian philosophy, so it can make a few devastating comments on things like jew-christian theocracy, for instance.
[...]
Anarchism denotes theoretical consideration and rhetoric related to defining and implementing (relatively) nonviolent social conventions and behavior.
Not just 'nonviolent' but consensual.
"Consensual" presents as a subset of "nonviolent."
The word "justice" indicates "adjustment."
Nah. The word justice indicates justice =) It's a word stolen from latin "justitia" (spanish justicia). "Adjustment' may come from the same root but it's a derived word and has a different meaning.
roman justice was even personified or made into a godess although roman justice was rather flawed. Regardless, the libertarian concept of justice stands. Justice being the state in which personal rights are respected, or restitution for rights violations is paid(to the extent possible)
She weighs events in the balance, blindfolded, while holding a sword. She measures, cuts and adjusts until the pans come out level. Witness the civilizing influence of the law at work. I would much rather see a simple attitude adjustment tried way before some strange woman breaks out the pointy hardware.
Lao Tzu say: "A man most conversant in the rites acts, but when no one responds, rolls up his sleeves and resorts to persuasion by force."
The most typical problems with any idealistic -ism arise when people take abstract ideas literally and try to apply them without consideration of material context in the real world. As guiding principles, abstractions like "anarchy" can deliver a lot of value; but as explicit instructions held to apply universally, they often achieve the exact opposite of their intended results.
That's kinda vague? But maybe you are referring to 'anarcho' fascists like berwick and the like? They perfectly fit my previous comments about fake libertarians and true fascists.
To clarify what I meant to say: People who imagine themselves absolutely right and act on that basis can turn anything into a moral excuse for tyranny. Even anarchism.
I bet if you criticize google, amazon and the rest of the NSA, berwick and his pal jakobo would go into hysterical pro-corporate propaganda mode, just like their accomplice, scumbag jeffrey tucker
Tons of pop culture, corporate media references, and political literature present anarchism a sort of violent nihilism. To one or another extent, the century-plus long full spectrum saturation Big Lie propaganda campaign against anarchism and anarchists affects everyone, including self identifying anarchists. To see working models of Frontier Justice in action, try participating in independent groups that do organized events and actions, and watch for this: A petty tyrant who calls himself an anarchist shows up (it's nearly always a guy) and must have his way - regardless of whether his way cuts right across the grain of consensus activities already in progress, alienate useful constituencies and alliances that took time and effort to build, and/or etc. He must have his way, and from his ultimate moral high ground he can win any argument about that, one way or another. Go to enough meetings and events and one of those will eventually turn up. Check out how the more experienced anarchists - if any - manage his case: If they know their business they will salvage him - if possible. That starts with 'active listening' and probing for common ground, and often ends with a valuable new community member. If instead he gets firmly invited to leave, that would most likely indicate a history of violence against other participants - but don't assume, find out. "Real ultimate fighting means learning to be friends." - The Covert Comic
https://mises.org/library/movie-gets-it-right
https://allevents.in/acapulco/anarchapulco-2019-with-jeffrey-tucker/20002435...
Well bless his heart, looking at that took 30 seconds I won't get back. The Tar Baby Principle says "you are attached to what you attack." I don't want to get any of that Tucker stuff on me. :o)
Live TV coverage of arrest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QXSefWYsyE
Screen shots of Assange arrest, resisting limp and shouting: https://cryptome.org/assange-arrested.jpg https://cryptome.org/assange-arrested2.jpg https://cryptome.org/assange-arrested3.jpg
On April 10, 2019 11:02:02 PM UTC, Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:50:18 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Dealing with Pedophilia in an Anarchist Society with Yaakov Markel via Anarchast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NWLFBHrWdU
of course, another quite remarkable thing is how this two scumbags
On 4/10/19 4:03 PM, Punk wrote: parrot to the tee the current psychobabble 'scientific' dogmas about 'therapists', 'trauma' and the like.
so here's a half sane voice to counter these 'libertarians'.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7633118-the-trauma-myth
" psychologist Susan Clancy reports on years of research and
contends that it is not the abuse* itself that causes trauma—but rather the narrative that is later imposed on the abuse experience."
go figure. It's all just...propaganda from monkeys and their
puritan, anti-sex (non) 'culture' based on jew-kkkristian (non) 'values'.
*there of course is no 'abuse' in consensual acts.
The inherent logical disconnect between anarchy and law enforcement underlines the irrelevance of /most/ debate about how an anarchist society should be run.
I prefer what used to be called frontier justice: When someone makes enough trouble to motivate enough people to do something about it, they act: Maybe a good talking-to; if that fails to curb the behavior in question, maybe running the offender out of town; if that seems inadequate to protect the community, maybe killing the bastard.
Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have.
It's definitely not perfect. Just look at all the lynchings that took place in the south after the civil war - nearly always of innocent black men (although James would, ridiculously, argue otherwise). It seems to me that "Frontier Justice" has historically been justice at the whim of a whipped up mob. Now - does that make it any worse than the absurdly inhumane mass incarceration and extrajudicial killings practiced by state sponsored pigs all over the country today? Obviously, no ;) I don't have a precise idea of how "justice" in an anarchist society would work, but it seems to me that there are a couple of things that are obvious. You have a right to protect your person and and anyone else actively under attack, with whatever force necessary. Beyond that, I think total shunning of a bad actor (refusing to participate in trade or any other aspect of the local society) might be the best way to get rid of them. Of course, as with anything else, this system is also imperfect ;)
Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating tort claims, on a level playing field where wealth, power, and political prejudice provide no advantages, can exist.
:o)
participants (6)
-
grarpamp
-
John Newman
-
John Young
-
Punk
-
Steve Kinney
-
Zenaan Harkness