[WAR] Tulsi Gabbard: "Why is the United States supporting Al Qaeda, when it was Al Qaeda who attacked the United States on 9-11, not Syria."
Finally at least a little sanity is returning to the USA's political conversation. Tulsi Gabbard visited Syria and gave interview to CNN, asks: "Why is the United States supporting Al Qaeda, when it was Al Qaeda who attacked the United States on 9-11, not Syria." http://theduran.com/cnns-jake-tapper-gets-educated-by-tulsi-gabbard-why-is-u...
On 1/27/2017 9:59 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Finally at least a little sanity is returning to the USA's political conversation.
Tulsi Gabbard visited Syria and gave interview to CNN, asks: "Why is the United States supporting Al Qaeda, when it was Al Qaeda who attacked the United States on 9-11, not Syria." http://theduran.com/cnns-jake-tapper-gets-educated-by-tulsi-gabbard-why-is-u...
It is the Trumpening. Tulsi Gabbard was always a thorn in the side of the Blue Empire, but she started speaking truth to power when Trump was elected. Tulsi Gabbard is described as a Combat Veteran. Normally, of course, women in combat are whores, cowards, and traitors, but Tulsi Gabbard, though forced to dress in men's clothes, did not pretend to shoot at the enemy, did not pretend to be a warrior, but instead bravely and patriotically took care of warriors injured on the battlefield, a proper role for a brave and patriotic woman, which role exposed her to real danger, though of course less danger than an actual warrior, as is only proper, for women are the precious sex, while men are the expendable sex. However in our degenerate era, women who perform their proper roles in war and battle are forced to dress as men, and get men's job descriptions, when they should be classed as camp followers, and given more flattering costumes. Eighty percent of our army, including all the women and nearly all the nonwhites, should be reclassified as camp followers, rather than soldiers. Which does not make anything Tulsi Gabbard did any the less honorable, brave, and patriotic, despite being forced to dress as a trannie pervert.
On Jan 26, 2017, at 7:18 PM, James A. Donald <jamesd@echeque.com> barfed: It is the Trumpening.
Your handsome man crush, on a 70 year old with a fucking dead beaver on his head. It's so cute!! Maybe he'll grab your pussy if you ask him real nice.
Tulsi Gabbard was always a thorn in the side of the Blue Empire, but she started speaking truth to power when Trump was elected.
Tulsi Gabbard is described as a Combat Veteran. Normally, of course, women in combat are whores, cowards, and traitors, but Tulsi Gabbard, though forced to dress in men's clothes, did not pretend to shoot at the enemy, did not pretend to be a warrior, but instead bravely and patriotically took care of warriors injured on the battlefield, a proper role for a brave and patriotic woman, which role exposed her to real danger, though of course less danger than an actual warrior, as is only proper, for women are the precious sex, while men are the expendable sex.
However in our degenerate era, women who perform their proper roles in war and battle are forced to dress as men, and get men's job descriptions, when they should be classed as camp followers, and given more flattering costumes.
Eighty percent of our army, including all the women and nearly all the nonwhites, should be reclassified as camp followers, rather than soldiers.
Which does not make anything Tulsi Gabbard did any the less honorable, brave, and patriotic, despite being forced to dress as a trannie pervert.
Id recommend you keep your ideas about women's fashion to yourself, for when you're playing dress up - because nobody gives a shit. Your email did remind me to make another change to my mail filters though, so thanks for that.
participants (3)
-
James A. Donald -
John Newman -
Zenaan Harkness