First the government harassed me and claimed it wasn't happening, going so far as to put me into the strange mid-ground between a mental health hold and arresting me. Then they claim that... what? It was an elaborate long term plan? I outright say the government is harassing me... and they are. And the government is lying about it. The government likes to brag it has capabilities, but the problem is that they hire stupid people. You have to be stupid not to see the US as corrupt, while having access to all that they do. The government is trying to outsmart me. It has immense resources, and it is failing horribly, even though I am just one person, systematically isolated (no incriminating metadata though, right?), and is failing. Every time. And I can say this because the government brags that it is doing it, so they have to create a parallel investigation every few months to find something new to pin on me. And then I ruin the parallel investigation because apparently only a genius can understand that "any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex...". I demand my own freedom. The government says no. The stakes are too stupid for this to continue, and yet it does. The government is able to lie, yes. The government is self-aware that some actions are unpopular yes. The government believes it is executing the will of the people. Um. To quote a previous email from me: On a side note, what is the legal culpability of someone who wasn't on the radar of an investigation, is alleged to be involved by a third party already admittedly unreliable due to lies, as a result, the first party faces the full brunt of an investigation for a decade while the third party goes off scott free? This is one of self-evident impropriety things. What was the motivation for focusing immense resources on me? Because some psychologist in the Behavioral Analysis Unit thought I was most likely to crack? I wasn't involved. The government made me involved. There is no metadata. I demand the government to disclose the facts. The government believes it is representative, and so it conceals the truth. And so I post this, yet the government has no real reaction? I think I should go further, the government is intimidated, and so it must engage in secrecy. Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, June 28, 2019 6:55 PM, Ryan Carboni <33389@protonmail.com> wrote:
.... What was the motivation for focusing immense resources on me? Because some psychologist in the Behavioral Analysis Unit thought I was most likely to crack?
a common outcome in deterrence strategies is acting out. they provoke you until you commit an actionable offense. they're destroying your life - it's easy to see how this provocation often succeeds. if you act out, their bias and prejudice is confirmed. you deserved it all along. if you suffer through, well, you did something wrong they can't pin on you. fair 'nuff. seen through a scanner darkly, there are no innocents.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 07:10:43PM +0000, coderman wrote:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, June 28, 2019 6:55 PM, Ryan Carboni <33389@protonmail.com> wrote:
.... What was the motivation for focusing immense resources on me? Because some psychologist in the Behavioral Analysis Unit thought I was most likely to crack?
a common outcome in deterrence strategies is acting out. they provoke you until you commit an actionable offense.
they're destroying your life - it's easy to see how this provocation often succeeds.
if you act out, their bias and prejudice is confirmed. you deserved it all along.
if you suffer through, well, you did something wrong they can't pin on you. fair 'nuff.
seen through a scanner darkly, there are no innocents.
Yes, "our" governments have by deemonic statute fiat, created (almost?) all citizens as criminals, under permanent stress in relation to everyday activities from driving to browsing to shopping to communicating to associating with acquaintances to every other bit of living. Must disagree though - no, there's no "fair enough" about it! When the star chambers uphold oppressive laws by which every citizen is in one technicality or another, a criminal, we have arrived where our governments are simply the slightly better organized gang committing literally highway robbery, at gunpoint, upon the majority. This is by no sane measure "fair enough" - the reason "one suffers, well you did something wrong" is because normal human behaviour has been declared criminal: - talking about criminal government actions ("all government actions are national security, no government action is illegal") - travelling safely to friends or for shopping ("you drove at 8% over the speed limit, that's a strict liability, and your suspended license due to similar offences means you are now at risk of jail") - random blood sampling (to "combat" drug and drink driving) - forced medication (e.g. fluoride in the water, rainwater tanks used to be illegal in most of Australia, highly punitive regimes for those who choose medications other than vaccinations) - criminalization of the right to bear arms - criminalization of the right to grow any plant/ certain plants - publishing certain crimes (whistleblowing), and certain "crimes" (hate speech, and "crimes" which may not be legally published) - securing, or even attempting to secure, your private communications with other humans and on, and on, and on. If you are not a criminal, you are not living a normal life. And if you are predatorial and engage in criminal actions on others of good character (a criminal in the traditional meaning of the word), often enough the courts will uphold your behaviour or let you off with extraordinarily lenient sentences, whilst actual victims are further victimized/ demonized. It's a tough time to be alive. Create your world muh grits,
participants (3)
-
coderman -
Ryan Carboni -
Zenaan Harkness