Not self-promotion, that's not the reason. Just needed to let out what I think about this. Those who don't find it arguable in terms of general social behavior can ignore this thread. Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 7:07 PM, John Young wrote:

Trying to enlist list or SM members in a groveling campaign of self-promotion is as pandemical online as off. Aggrieved lament at minimal interest is a necessary fart let, expecting some kind idler to come forth with a deodorant, or a mean ass-wipe to hurl turds at the stank bitch pleader.

Here you are, this is where to wiggle into a troll-fish-trap.

To comment further, it looks like P-S may have been setting up a little disruption around the difference between the goals of your project and the benefits and failings of existing blockchains, and maybe some other social differences going on. I can't know why they would do that, but often it's satisfying to see the different people involved learn by getting confused around each other, because it means the confusion is on a path to resolving (even if that resolution involves further conflict). Blockchains are a high-emotions topic for some: hating or loving them for a variety of reasons. P-S's interaction with you resulted in you making this post, and us responding to you. On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:02 PM Karl wrote:

Hey,

It's notable that your software is closed source, and I really understand open source as what is expected to be supported on this list.

But Punk-Stasi was "flaming" you and you don't need to listen to that. People aren't censored here. That means random criticism comes through. Do you need help setting up filters?

K

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:06 AM other.arkitech < other.arkitech@protonmail.com> wrote:

...

Dear readers, My intention is to respond to a public attack against my honesty and the legitimacy of my proposal.

I am pretty annoyed for the behavior of this individual in the list towards the system I am presenting here.

I don't know anything about him or her or whether they are a group of gansters operating the same moniker. The only thing I know is that they are pushing my project USPS is a SCAM and thus I am a SCAMMER, or the other way around.

I call to everyone willing to read the landing page of my project, which I provide a pdf attached, and, from it and the ideas grasped in this list, manifest IF it could be deduced that this is a scam, or looks like. Please manifest.

Otherwise, everyone undermining legitimate and respectable projects run by others, in any stage of development, on any stage in their roadmap, with counter positive and public undermining attitude. Those should be IMHO punished with public ashame until an apology is published by, in this case, PunkStasi.

I leave it this way, Please, anyone, let me know reasons for which this email is WRONG or/and RIGHT. Thanks. -- Other Arkitech

The project this subject airs as a scam: http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/ Ref: https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-May/080648.html

Hey, It's notable that your software is closed source, and I really understand open source as what is expected to be supported on this list.

But Punk-Stasi was "flaming" you and you don't need to listen to that. People aren't censored here. That means random criticism comes through. Do you need help setting up filters? K

Nah, one thing is criticism and other is a guy calling you repeatedly a scammer when you are showing up your work. That is not precisely good taste. the source code is GPL, but I haven't published it yet, that's all. Is in the roadmap. For reasons it will be released before 1.0

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:06 AM other.arkitech wrote:

...

Dear readers, My intention is to respond to a public attack against my honesty and the legitimacy of my proposal.

I am pretty annoyed for the behavior of this individual in the list towards the system I am presenting here.

I don't know anything about him or her or whether they are a group of gansters operating the same moniker. The only thing I know is that they are pushing my project USPS is a SCAM and thus I am a SCAMMER, or the other way around.

I call to everyone willing to read the landing page of my project, which I provide a pdf attached, and, from it and the ideas grasped in this list, manifest IF it could be deduced that this is a scam, or looks like. Please manifest.

Otherwise, everyone undermining legitimate and respectable projects run by others, in any stage of development, on any stage in their roadmap, with counter positive and public undermining attitude. Those should be IMHO punished with public ashame until an apology is published by, in this case, PunkStasi.

I leave it this way, Please, anyone, let me know reasons for which this email is WRONG or/and RIGHT. Thanks. -- Other Arkitech

The project this subject airs as a scam: http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/ Ref: https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-May/080648.html