The Washington Post: The Cybersecurity 202: The Justice Department is racking up wins despite encryption concerns
The Washington Post: The Cybersecurity 202: The Justice Department is racking up wins despite encryption concerns. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/06/16/cybersecurity-202-justice...
The article talks about difficulties stopping serious crime when encryption appears secure. Since crime is in law enforcement too, we obviously need open public surveillance of our enforcement workers, to give them our private keys, and once both those things happen we can probably together stop all injustice efficiently. Most of the public are not members of organised crime trying to coerce the police. Most of the public want a safe environment where they can raise a forthrightly protected family in the ways they choose.
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:45:48 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
Since crime is in law enforcement too,
no it isn't. Your masters define what 'crime' is.
we obviously need open public surveillance of our enforcement workers, to give them our private keys, and once both those things happen we can probably together stop all injustice efficiently.
people who 'cooperate' with cops need killing just like cops.
Most of the public are not members of organised crime trying to coerce the police. Most of the public want a safe environment where they can raise a forthrightly protected family in the ways they choose.
yeah, THINK OF THE CHILDREN.
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:55:59 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
yeah, THINK OF THE CHILDREN.
Well I ignored everything else you said
I know. That's the only thing a govt agent can do.
because you capitalised this and it's obviously important to everybody. What are you talking about?
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 21:01:06 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
To clarify here, I'm saying I'd like it if surveillance were controlled by the people rather than the powerful.
yes I know. You're a surveillance advocate in the cpunks mailing list. from the start you've praised the privacy destroying properties of 'blockchains'.
need open public surveillance of our enforcement workers
You don't hire them, you don't pay them, they don't follow your instructions, they have no legal mandate to "protect" or "serve" you, they don't work for you, thus they don't. They can literally stand by and watch you get murdered on the street with no obligation to arrest, prosecute, try, or sentence. In fact, the politicians you gave yourselves up to even banned you from being able to do any of those functions on your own when they fail to do so. They work for the politicians, who steal money from you to pay them to protect and serve and follow themselves, the rest is a play to keep the peace from rising up. It's a clear conflict of interest. Put the cameras on the politicians first, watch how fast they get thrown out and never replaced, for being elements in conflict with everyone, and generally useless wastes, when you can do better on your own without them.
give them our private keys... stops injustice
Giving away the tools you have to help stop injustice against you, and the rights to keep and use those tools... will only make injustice much easier to do against you.
I'd like it if surveillance were controlled by the people rather than the powerful.
"Democracy" "elected" "control"... same NAP and rights violating as the "powerful" kings... a fairy tale that doesn't work. People want to surveill something... then go put your cams on the perimeter of your own bounds looking in, that way you only see what crosses over, and your own ridiculous selves most of the time. A few minutes of that should buzzkill your spyveillance wet dreams. Talk among yourselves... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hmy1jjRnl8I leftist anarchos https://anarchy101.org/179/what-are-anarchist-alternatives-to-the-police https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/06/17/police-queer-anarchist-jewish-cafe-pin... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldNWOpxTADg
participants (4)
-
grarpamp -
jim bell -
Karl -
Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0