One has to wonder if the Gatwik dronners simply found a way to modify the wifi frequency placing it out of the ISM band and the military's radio countermeasures were specifically only for those frequencies.
On Friday, December 21, 2018, 12:23:44 PM PST, Steven Schear <schear.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
One has to wonder if the Gatwik dronners simply found a way to modify the wifi frequency placing it out of the ISM band and the military's radio countermeasures were specifically only for those frequencies. That sounds relatively simple. One problem might be that on a spectrum analyzer, a set of WiFi-looking signals, a few tens of MHz from where WiFi ought to be, would stick out like a sore thumb. The large majority of airport-visiting people have cell phones, and many of them will be accessing WiFi at any given time. It seems to me that anybody attempting to control a drone secretly might want to "hide in plain sight", using an existing WiFi system. Jim Bell
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 09:20:11AM +0000, jim bell wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2018, 12:23:44 PM PST, Steven Schear <schear.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
One has to wonder if the Gatwik dronners simply found a way to modify the wifi frequency placing it out of the ISM band and the military's radio countermeasures were specifically only for those frequencies. That sounds relatively simple. One problem might be that on a spectrum analyzer, a set of WiFi-looking signals, a few tens of MHz from where WiFi ought to be, would stick out like a sore thumb. The large majority of airport-visiting people have cell phones, and many of them will be accessing WiFi at any given time. It seems to me that anybody attempting to control a drone secretly might want to "hide in plain sight", using an existing WiFi system. Jim Bell
With the whooparse USA received over in the Mediterranean, Syria etc, a certain (((faction))) realised their stars and stripes war machine is not quite up to par with that being delivered by our Russkie nation respecting bros, which put somewhat of a halt to the Team America nation destroying plan. (At least, that plan for destroying those nations not bound to the BIS and IMF - Libya, Iraq, NK, Syria and Iran. "Surely it could not be that simple, insidious, evil, abhorrent, power hungry, despotic etc?" "Stop calling me Shirley already!" If this draw down/ pull out from Syria and Afghanistan is real, we have avoided the worst of an otherwise likely WW3. You see, $22 trillion debt, or anything in the ball park, was known before it happened - an absolute mathematical certainty of this cyclical instability - the "financial reset" or new "great depression". And this financial moment in history was intended as the tool, along with the dogs of war, to, amidst the chaos of war, the strife arising from infiniggemmigration and general societal unrest, impose the new one world order upon a hapless 7 billion humans. The way this was done is thankfully intolerable to certain unspeakably merciless dictators as Putin and Qadhafi, which is why those two in particular set about meddling into our glorious Western demoncracies as we innocently and graciously swung our international CoCs upon the unwashed, unkempt, uncouth third worlders, second worlders and "yet to be enlightened first worlders", unleasing our merciful rods of power to straighten out this otherwise broken world. Would have been <ahem> a pillar of glory, a shining city on the hill, a new era of peace, unlimited prosperity for the worthy few, and a free global love order for all. </> Why that election meddling cretin Putin took exception to this audacious yet infinitely compassionate plan, is simply beyond me <flutters eyelids> =) Now now muh grits, stop weaponising humour you hear me? or CNN is going to get a hoky tonky cranky danky spanky wanky winky wonky, cranky shanky very stinky, shonky wonky donkey in its breakfast, and we just can't have that now can we? The Wonky Donkey grandmas who struggle to finish the story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRtWNrpeXnE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbsZohEMn38 The very silly Wonky Donky song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDeQT9zCvi )
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 06:09:28AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 09:20:11AM +0000, jim bell wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2018, 12:23:44 PM PST, Steven Schear <schear.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
One has to wonder if the Gatwik dronners simply found a way to modify the wifi frequency placing it out of the ISM band and the military's radio countermeasures were specifically only for those frequencies. That sounds relatively simple. One problem might be that on a spectrum analyzer, a set of WiFi-looking signals, a few tens of MHz from where WiFi ought to be, would stick out like a sore thumb. The large majority of airport-visiting people have cell phones, and many of them will be accessing WiFi at any given time. It seems to me that anybody attempting to control a drone secretly might want to "hide in plain sight", using an existing WiFi system. Jim Bell
With the whooparse USA received over in the Mediterranean, Syria etc, a certain (((faction))) realised their stars and stripes war machine is not quite up to par with that being delivered by our Russkie nation respecting bros, which put somewhat of a halt to the Team America nation destroying plan.
Point being, Gatwick is entirely likely a false flag to clandestinely motivate the govt cheque book and public support for future tech around drones.
(At least, that plan for destroying those nations not bound to the BIS and IMF - Libya, Iraq, NK, Syria and Iran.
"Surely it could not be that simple, insidious, evil, abhorrent, power hungry, despotic etc?"
"Stop calling me Shirley already!"
If this draw down/ pull out from Syria and Afghanistan is real, we have avoided the worst of an otherwise likely WW3. You see, $22 trillion debt, or anything in the ball park, was known before it happened - an absolute mathematical certainty of this cyclical instability - the "financial reset" or new "great depression".
And this financial moment in history was intended as the tool, along with the dogs of war, to, amidst the chaos of war, the strife arising from infiniggemmigration and general societal unrest, impose the new one world order upon a hapless 7 billion humans.
The way this was done is thankfully intolerable to certain unspeakably merciless dictators as Putin and Qadhafi, which is why those two in particular set about meddling into our glorious Western demoncracies as we innocently and graciously swung our international CoCs upon the unwashed, unkempt, uncouth third worlders, second worlders and "yet to be enlightened first worlders", unleasing our merciful rods of power to straighten out this otherwise broken world.
Would have been <ahem> a pillar of glory, a shining city on the hill, a new era of peace, unlimited prosperity for the worthy few, and a free global love order for all. </>
Why that election meddling cretin Putin took exception to this audacious yet infinitely compassionate plan, is simply beyond me <flutters eyelids> =)
Now now muh grits, stop weaponising humour you hear me? or CNN is going to get a hoky tonky cranky danky spanky wanky winky wonky, cranky shanky very stinky, shonky wonky donkey in its breakfast, and we just can't have that now can we?
The Wonky Donkey grandmas who struggle to finish the story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRtWNrpeXnE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbsZohEMn38
The very silly Wonky Donky song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDeQT9zCvi )
For being a false flag I'd not be surprised. Still, few outside of military radio development know gov'ts now routinely use UWB underlays for numerous purposes, including cognitive radio. AFAIK, there's no regulatory prohibition against UWB in the ISM bands, so development and testing could easily proceed OTA. Once tested, changing the bands could be straightforward. I am using the term "UWB" broadly and not the more restrictive regulatory definition. If the drones are not configured to use HD video the required bandwidth is miniscule and the process gain (PG) substantial compared with the baseband data rates. Very high PG makes signal detection and jamming more difficult. Probably also coming soon, very high PGs wherein the codes, bandwidth and frequencies quickly hop according to a shared secret between the drone and its controller. This combination is being explored for possible Next Generation military comms. On Sat, Dec 22, 2018, 1:20 AM jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2018, 12:23:44 PM PST, Steven Schear < schear.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
One has to wonder if the Gatwik dronners simply found a way to modify the wifi frequency placing it out of the ISM band and the military's radio countermeasures were specifically only for those frequencies.
That sounds relatively simple. One problem might be that on a spectrum analyzer, a set of WiFi-looking signals, a few tens of MHz from where WiFi ought to be, would stick out like a sore thumb.
The large majority of airport-visiting people have cell phones, and many of them will be accessing WiFi at any given time. It seems to me that anybody attempting to control a drone secretly might want to "hide in plain sight", using an existing WiFi system.
Jim Bell
participants (3)
-
jim bell -
Steven Schear -
Zenaan Harkness