Re: [Cryptography] HSMs or Intel SGX? Which is harder to hack?
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@gmail.com> wrote:
If you wanted to store secrets so securely that you could never get them out, how would you do it? The secrets need to be usable for things like signing, but they should be unrecoverable. In particular, is it better to buy an HSM, or use Intel's SGX mode on some of its newer processors?
Don't use a general purpose device. Though certainly dedicated HSM's have their list of hacks too. Note that some regard SGX https://github.com/kudelskisecurity/sgxfun as having already been broken https://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/users/weichbr/papers/esorics2016.pdf and btw ASLR just got beat up again https://www.vusec.net/projects/anc/ https://github.com/vusec/revanc https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/02/new-aslr-busting-javascript-is-abou... -make-drive-by-exploits-much-nastier/ Esorics 2016 freebies http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-45744-4 http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-45741-3
participants (1)
-
grarpamp