Re: [Cryptography] threat models, was Krugman blockchain currency skepticism
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 6:05 PM, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
In article <CAD2Ti29oru2WUyQ01gr+UL1M-cAAvj0ZuVraPGeULnYz7TqtvQ@mail.gmail.com>, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Cryptocurrency value moved every month is 30x paypal's and growing. Ten more years and those 200 million users will be on cryptocurrency.
Paypal's current transaction volume is about $40 billion/month, growing at a modest rate. Can you tell us where you get your number of $1.2 trillion/month for cryptocurrencies?
https://www.statista.com/statistics/277841/paypals-total-payment-volume/
That should have been ~3x (2.7x) coming from just the BTC value volume moved, and ~385B$/mo for the entire cryptocurrency space, both using today's coinmarketcap rates. Paypal is also doing ~295 tx/s, which might just be eclipsed by even early iterations of below stress work with a single cryptocurrency (even more when summing the current capabilities of top 10 decentralized cryptos for example representing and carrying the market space for tx / tps)... https://stresstestbitcoin.cash/ ~25.6M tx/d will beat Paypal, with perhaps only 33% of that needed to make news waves. Paypal claims ~245M "active" users, or 3.2% of world pop, which smells a little fishy. BTC alone has ~55M utxo's, consolidated down into owned wallets at recent oppurtunity from peak of ~68M, some study estimates try taking that down further to approx body count. Cryptocurrency has no worries there either, and again, starts making waves before then. And Paypal has never made the world's daily syndicated TV and print news like cryptocurrency has. Regardless of which sources you choose, cryptocurrency is close at the heels of Paypal, already biting off chunks in some areas, including philosophical ones. Expect Paypal to be completely eclipsed by cryptocurrency in five years or less.
If an issuer doesn't redeem a bill what recourse do you have other than to denounce him?
Cryptocurrency... you either have the keys and value or you don't.
I don't want a wallet hash
That's smart, because whoever told you you could spend such a construct is a fraud.
these were bills redeemable in real assets. I want my kilo of platinum or whatever. What's my recourse when the platinum doesn't show up?
Precisely, such bills are a risk with variable recourse. "Bills of exchange by different issuers" The blockchain takes care of issues with "issuers" "bills" and reputation, you either have the confirmed spend or you don't, and you're stupid if you walk off before you do. And the market takes care what other "assets" one can get in "exchange" for the UTXO's you're about to spend. You're of course free to make and sign whatever other contracts / bills you want, call them private pegs / tethers if it makes you happy, and accept all their risks. This is basically arguing volatility again, and what cryptocurrency is saying, Neo, is that you won't need to. [1] Those who argue volatility against decentralized cryptocurrency shouldn't do so as what they're saying is they... - really want centralized regulated fiat equivalents - clearly don't get that *of course* by their very nature decentralized cryptocurrencies are *expected* to be "volatile" early on. This is an innate feature, not a bug. But hey while people are on the "volatility" tip, look at all the other *volatile* central regulated fiats out there both new and old... https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_by_date_of_formation https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_currencies And lots of other reasons you might not want them... https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_sovereign_states https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_historical_geopolitical_changes All that pegging, tethering, backing, and government guns people say gives [nonvolatile] value... doesn't seem to be doing a very good job of it. Perhaps it's time the world, and you, tries something truly different, for once, in like thousands of years, of not doing so, lol. It's out there, and could be in your wallet today, and spent in some equitable trade tomorrow. # other
Obviously, you can be cut off by governments, payment processors, exchanges, [etc list of formal entities]
Nowhere in those blurbs was the direct P2P functionality of decentralized cryptocurrencies mentioned... much harder to cut that off without nuking the underlying [sneaker] nets, the difficulty of that mentioned in another thread.
Reputation is entirely based upon non-repudiation, and liability (provably having sufficient real assets to cover their outstanding balance). Blockchain currency doesn't have either of those properties.
Neither does fiat. Try and invent them on top of them if you want.
Manafort is also learning
About decentralized cryptocurrencies, and the gold watch, along with the rest of the world's people. [bcc cypherpunks]
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 6:05 PM, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
In article <CAD2Ti29oru2WUyQ01gr+UL1M-cAAvj0ZuVraPGeULnYz7TqtvQ@mail.gmail.com>, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
Cryptocurrency value moved every month is 30x paypal's and growing. Ten more years and those 200 million users will be on cryptocurrency.
Paypal's current transaction volume is about $40 billion/month, growing at a modest rate. Can you tell us where you get your number of $1.2 trillion/month for cryptocurrencies?
https://www.statista.com/statistics/277841/paypals-total-payment-volume/
That should have been ~3x (2.7x) coming from just the BTC value volume moved, and ~385B$/mo for the entire cryptocurrency space, both using today's coinmarketcap rates. Paypal is also doing ~295 tx/s, which might just be eclipsed by even early iterations of below stress work with a single cryptocurrency (even more when summing the current capabilities of top 10 decentralized cryptos for example representing and carrying the market space for tx / tps)... https://stresstestbitcoin.cash/ ~25.6M tx/d will beat Paypal, with perhaps only 33% of that needed to make news waves. Paypal claims ~245M "active" users, or 3.2% of world pop, which smells a little fishy. BTC alone has ~55M utxo's, consolidated down into owned wallets at recent oppurtunity from peak of ~68M, some study estimates try taking that down further to approx body count. Cryptocurrency has no worries there either, and again, starts making waves before then. And Paypal has never made the world's daily syndicated TV and print news like cryptocurrency has. Regardless of which sources you choose, cryptocurrency is close at the heels of Paypal, already biting off chunks in some areas, including philosophical ones. Expect Paypal to be completely eclipsed by cryptocurrency in five years or less.
If an issuer doesn't redeem a bill what recourse do you have other than to denounce him?
Cryptocurrency... you either have the keys and value or you don't.
I don't want a wallet hash
That's smart, because whoever told you you could spend such a construct is a fraud.
these were bills redeemable in real assets. I want my kilo of platinum or whatever. What's my recourse when the platinum doesn't show up?
Precisely, such bills are a risk with variable recourse. "Bills of exchange by different issuers" The blockchain takes care of issues with "issuers" "bills" and reputation, you either have the confirmed spend or you don't, and you're stupid if you walk off before you do. And the market takes care what other "assets" one can get in "exchange" for the UTXO's you're about to spend. You're of course free to make and sign whatever other contracts / bills you want, call them private pegs / tethers if it makes you happy, and accept all their risks. This is basically arguing volatility again, and what cryptocurrency is saying, Neo, is that you won't need to. [1] Those who argue volatility against decentralized cryptocurrency shouldn't do so as what they're saying is they... - really want centralized regulated fiat equivalents - clearly don't get that *of course* by their very nature decentralized cryptocurrencies are *expected* to be "volatile" early on. This is an innate feature, not a bug. But hey while people are on the "volatility" tip, look at all the other *volatile* central regulated fiats out there both new and old... https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_by_date_of_formation https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_currencies And lots of other reasons you might not want them... https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_sovereign_states https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_historical_geopolitical_changes All that pegging, tethering, backing, and government guns people say gives [nonvolatile] value... doesn't seem to be doing a very good job of it. Perhaps it's time the world, and you, tries something truly different, for once, in like thousands of years, of not doing so, lol. It's out there, and could be in your wallet today, and spent in some equitable trade tomorrow. # other
Obviously, you can be cut off by governments, payment processors, exchanges, [etc list of formal entities]
Nowhere in those blurbs was the direct P2P functionality of decentralized cryptocurrencies mentioned... much harder to cut that off without nuking the underlying [sneaker] nets, the difficulty of that mentioned in another thread.
Reputation is entirely based upon non-repudiation, and liability (provably having sufficient real assets to cover their outstanding balance). Blockchain currency doesn't have either of those properties.
Neither does fiat. Try and invent them on top of them if you want.
Manafort is also learning
About decentralized cryptocurrencies, and the gold watch, along with the rest of the world's people. [bcc cypherpunks] Reposting bcc cyphepunks as censorship on an approved variety thread where moderator already logged in and finished the daily queue is hypocritical. Or as to afford another chance to non fat finger, or delivery.
participants (1)
-
grarpamp