On 11/04/19 14:49, John Young wrote:
Sneaky. That doesn't look good for Julian. The UK Courts might refuse to extradite for publishing the Manning stuff, but conspiring before the fact to assist in the theft of more info... if the evidence is there, he's in trouble. Peter Fairbrother
Is there a text version of this indictment available. (Not just the image; possibly OCR'd?) Jim Bell On Thursday, April 11, 2019, 7:30:46 AM PDT, Peter Fairbrother <peter@tsto.co.uk> wrote: On 11/04/19 14:49, John Young wrote:
Sneaky. That doesn't look good for Julian. The UK Courts might refuse to extradite for publishing the Manning stuff, but conspiring before the fact to assist in the theft of more info... if the evidence is there, he's in trouble. Peter Fairbrother
On 27/04/19 18:15, jim bell wrote:
Is there a text version of this indictment available. (Not just the image; possibly OCR'd?)
Jim Bell
Can't help you there, but I read the document referenced below, the original indictment, at the time it was released. Some time later I read the document giving the charges for the extradition hearing and, while the charges were broadly the same, it was a different document. Sorry, I can't find it now - it was in a UK newspaper somewhere. Peter Fairbrother
On Thursday, April 11, 2019, 7:30:46 AM PDT, Peter Fairbrother <peter@tsto.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/04/19 14:49, John Young wrote:
Sneaky. That doesn't look good for Julian.
The UK Courts might refuse to extradite for publishing the Manning stuff, but conspiring before the fact to assist in the theft of more info... if the evidence is there, he's in trouble.
Peter Fairbrother
participants (3)
-
jim bell -
John Young -
Peter Fairbrother