Few things so foolish as the Gramps-style anti-statist
To demonize state authoritarianism while ignoring identical albeit contract-consecrated subservient arrangements in the large-scale corporations which control the world economy is fetishism at its worst. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/bob-black-the-libertarian-as-conserv...
"To demonize state authoritarianism while ignoring identical albeit contract-consecrated subservient arrangements in the large-scale corporations which control the world economy is fetishism at its worst. " https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/bob-black-the-libertarian-as-conserv... Except that some people "forget" that "state authoritarianism" is usually imposed involuntarily upon all inhabitants of a huge geographical land area, with essentially no competition at all. Whereas contract-based systems generally include very high levels of competition. So, calling them "identical" is laughably false.
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:25:30 +0000 (UTC) jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
"To demonize state authoritarianism while ignoring identical albeit contract-consecrated subservient arrangements in the large-scale corporations which control the world economy is fetishism at its worst. "
So, calling them "identical" is laughably false.
look! Fucking communist jim bell, 'leading advocate' of 'socialized medicine' is babbling nonsense about political philosophy. Shocking!!
hi jim On 12/12/21, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
"To demonize state authoritarianism while ignoring identical albeit contract-consecrated subservient arrangements in the large-scale corporations which control the world economy is fetishism at its worst. "
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/bob-black-the-libertarian-as-conserv... Except that some people "forget" that "state authoritarianism" is usually imposed involuntarily upon all inhabitants of a huge geographical land area, with essentially no competition at all. Whereas contract-based systems generally include very high levels of competition.
So, calling them "identical" is laughably false.
what you say here makes sense; i think you're kind of saying that governments have an enforced monopoly in their territory, such that there are fewer natural systems keeping them in line. do you have any thoughts on how, in the day-to-day world, one would handle oppression by a corporation vs oppression by a government?
participants (4)
-
jim bell -
Karl -
professor rat -
Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0