U.S. lawyers tell UK court Assange can safely be extradited
https://news.yahoo.com/assange-case-back-court-u-094406974.html LONDON (Reuters) -Lawyers for the United States launched a fresh attempt on Wednesday to have Julian Assange extradited from Britain, arguing that concerns abo... Jim Bell's comment: Notice that these articles don't address the Limitations period (Statute of limitations) issue. Assange remained in the nation where it was alleged he committed the crime(s). Recall I raised this matter a couple of years ago, and others. Also, that extradition is improper unless the act can be considered crime nal by the standards of both UK and USA. And if that were true, why not prosecute him in UK? Even now, I don't know if Assange's attorneys are raising these issues, let alone properly.
Part of the problem in some cases where the defendant is, or is being, physically or mentally, incapable or put under duress... is that they can lose cognitive control over their case and legal team, such team may then take on a autopilot life and issues of their own, or of someone else's manufactured or desired cause and issue of the day imparted into the the case, rather than the defendants best interests. Part of knowing is an assessment, does whichever defendant wish to fight, or do they just want out, or want other terms, and at what point and direction are they freely changing if any, on such intention as things progress. Unfortunately due to the nature of the system, priviledge, ongoing case and negotiations, etc... such defendants wishes at any point aren't usually known to the public. Not suggesting that's the case with Assange, that is for others to know and consider, but only that it can and does happen. #FreeAssange
participants (2)
-
grarpamp
-
jim bell