the intercept - corporate US mouthpiece
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-... for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above. one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes. notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
He comes from corporate lawyer land Money Scahill said when he was offered cash to start the shit he did no research about omidar and basically was like ok i will take your $ On Mar 25, 2017 1:08 AM, "juan" <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia- vulnerabilities-years-ago/
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
On 03/24/2017 04:16 PM, Cari Machet wrote:
He comes from corporate lawyer land
Constitutional Lawyer land after a stint as a partner in a corporate law firm. The firm that pretty much invented the poison pill defense against hostile takeovers that destroy ordinary shareholder value, and jobs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wachtell,_Lipton,_Rosen_%26_Katz
/Greenwald practiced law in the Litigation Department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (1994–1995); in 1996 he co-founded his own litigation firm, called Greenwald Christoph & Holland (later renamed Greenwald Christoph PC), where he litigated cases concerning issues of U.S. constitutional law and civil rights/.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Greenwald#Litigation_attorney
Money
Someone give you your computer Free rent, and food? Or do you live in a doorway and use the public terminals at libraries to post your spew?
Scahill said when he was offered cash to start the shit he did no research about omidar and basically was like ok i will take your $
All that matters is whether the publisher butts out and allows the editorial staff the freedom to decide. Ps. One of the other partners in that corporate law firm did this:
/A paper in September 2015 uncovered a similar advantage enjoyed by certain traders called The 8-K Trading Gap,[13] showing that company insiders traded their company's stock on the open market and profited doing so during the 4-day window between when market-moving information is known by company insiders and when they are required to disclose it to the public in an 8-K filing.[14]// //// //Other research by Jackson has demonstrated The Effects of Usury Laws on Higher-Risk Borrowers,[15] by showing that when usury laws became enforceable, credit issuance declined for higher-risk borrowers. The implications of this evidence became central during debate around the merits and risks of peer-to-peer lending platforms such as Lending Club,[16] /
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_J._Jackson_Jr. Moral of story (and I hope it's not too complex for simple minds like you and the Argentine troll to understand): Not all corporate lawyers answer to corporations. Rr
On Mar 25, 2017 1:08 AM, "juan" <juan.g71@gmail.com <mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com>> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-... <https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-years-ago/>
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:17:37 -0700 Razer <g2s@riseup.net> vomited:
Moral of story (and I hope it's not too complex for simple minds like you and the Argentine troll to understand):
Not all corporate lawyers answer to corporations.
Slavery is freedom. I didn't see that one coming, though admitedly I'm not paying too much attention. So we now know that "rayzer" is also a corporate apologist, sucking apple inc's cock. I suppose that "rayzer" must admire a fraud like greenwald since greenwald is a 'progressive' and member of the master race, like "rayzer". Summing up : "rayzer"'s curriculum is rather impressive. Statist commie-fascist (heil castro). Theocrat. False flag, pentagon propaganda agent (like his close cousin donald). And now apple-greenwald-paypal-ebay fanboy. Doubleplus barf!
Rr
On Mar 25, 2017 1:08 AM, "juan" <juan.g71@gmail.com <mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com>> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-... <https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-years-ago/>
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
On 03/24/2017 07:43 PM, juan wrote something sooooo predictable and expletive filled:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:17:37 -0700 Razer <g2s@riseup.net> vomited:
Moral of story (and I hope it's not too complex for simple minds like you and the Argentine troll to understand):
Not all corporate lawyers answer to corporations. Slavery is freedom.
I didn't see that one coming, though admitedly I'm not paying too much attention.
So we now know that "rayzer" is also a corporate apologist, sucking apple inc's cock. I suppose that "rayzer" must admire a fraud like greenwald since greenwald is a 'progressive' and member of the master race, like "rayzer".
Summing up : "rayzer"'s curriculum is rather impressive. Statist commie-fascist (heil castro). Theocrat. False flag, pentagon propaganda agent (like his close cousin donald). And now apple-greenwald-paypal-ebay fanboy.
Doubleplus barf!
Ps. I ALWAYS despised Jobs and Apple, most of what else you claim is wrong, and I never knew joos could be members of the massa race. PPs. EVERYTHING ELSE you know is wrong too! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAcHfymgh4Y I
Rr
On Mar 25, 2017 1:08 AM, "juan" <juan.g71@gmail.com <mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com>> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-... <https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-years-ago/>
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
On Mar 24, 2017, at 7:08 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-...
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
It seems to me Greenwald & co. used the Snowden revelations for self-enrichment to a very large degree. I guess you can argue all day long about their intentions, but there is no doubt the Snowden shit has been a massive gravy train for the journalists involved…. Not to say I would have stories put back in the bottle, obviously :P
On 03/25/2017 08:40 AM, John Newman wrote:
On Mar 24, 2017, at 7:08 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-...
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
It seems to me Greenwald & co. used the Snowden revelations for self-enrichment to a very large degree. I guess you can argue all day long about their intentions, but there is no doubt the Snowden shit has been a massive gravy train for the journalists involved….
Not to say I would have stories put back in the bottle, obviously :P
I'd say the Snowden Papers put The_Intercept on the continuation-of-publishing-viability 'gravy train' anyway. I haven't seen what @ggreenwald's tax returns look like so I have no way of judging his, or any of the staff's self-enrichment due to them. This article <http://frostsnow.com/glenn-greenwald-s-net-worth-is-8-5-billion-know-about-his-career-and-awards> claims his net worth was $8.5 billion dollars in 2013, before the Snowden papers fell in his lap, so it would seem he just doesn't need the money that much to swing in his hammock down in Brasil, and he was the founding partner of a law firm, not a cheap proposition, so his wealth likely precedes his publishing career. Further, according to Wikipedia he did his BA in Philosophy at GWU... NOT an inexpensive school to take a non-career-path Baccalaureate, so it would seem wealth was in the family before he ever had a career. Rr
On Mar 25, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
On 03/25/2017 08:40 AM, John Newman wrote:
On Mar 24, 2017, at 7:08 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-...
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
It seems to me Greenwald & co. used the Snowden revelations for self-enrichment to a very large degree. I guess you can argue all day long about their intentions, but there is no doubt the Snowden shit has been a massive gravy train for the journalists involved….
Not to say I would have stories put back in the bottle, obviously :P
I'd say the Snowden Papers put The_Intercept on the continuation-of-publishing-viability 'gravy train' anyway. I haven't seen what @ggreenwald's tax returns look like so I have no way of judging his, or any of the staff's self-enrichment due to them.
This article <http://frostsnow.com/glenn-greenwald-s-net-worth-is-8-5-billion-know-about-his-career-and-awards> claims his net worth was $8.5 billion dollars in 2013, before the Snowden papers fell in his lap, so it would seem he just doesn't need the money that much to swing in his hammock down in Brasil, and he was the founding partner of a law firm, not a cheap proposition, so his wealth likely precedes his publishing career. Further, according to Wikipedia he did his BA in Philosophy at GWU... NOT an inexpensive school to take a non-career-path Baccalaureate, so it would seem wealth was in the family before he ever had a career.
Rr
Interesting, I had no idea Greenwald was a BILLIONAIRE - presumably born that way? Or born with a lot of money and turned into more with legal career? In any case, changes my perspective a little. have to do some digging ;) John
On 03/25/2017 11:08 AM, John Newman wrote:
On Mar 25, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
On 03/25/2017 08:40 AM, John Newman wrote:
On Mar 24, 2017, at 7:08 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-...
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
It seems to me Greenwald & co. used the Snowden revelations for self-enrichment to a very large degree. I guess you can argue all day long about their intentions, but there is no doubt the Snowden shit has been a massive gravy train for the journalists involved….
Not to say I would have stories put back in the bottle, obviously :P
I'd say the Snowden Papers put The_Intercept on the continuation-of-publishing-viability 'gravy train' anyway. I haven't seen what @ggreenwald's tax returns look like so I have no way of judging his, or any of the staff's self-enrichment due to them.
This article <http://frostsnow.com/glenn-greenwald-s-net-worth-is-8-5-billion-know-about-his-career-and-awards> claims his net worth was $8.5 billion dollars in 2013, before the Snowden papers fell in his lap, so it would seem he just doesn't need the money that much to swing in his hammock down in Brasil, and he was the founding partner of a law firm, not a cheap proposition, so his wealth likely precedes his publishing career. Further, according to Wikipedia he did his BA in Philosophy at GWU... NOT an inexpensive school to take a non-career-path Baccalaureate, so it would seem wealth was in the family before he ever had a career.
Rr
Interesting, I had no idea Greenwald was a BILLIONAIRE - presumably born that way? Or born with a lot of money and turned into more with legal career?
In any case, changes my perspective a little. have to do some digging ;)
John
He certainly doesn't flaunt his wealth. I'm perhaps a little skeptical of the $8.5 billion figure but on the other hand net worth is an interesting calculation that can include intangibles and such. I think he was born into money. Wikipedia lists his parent's names but they don't have entries on site so it would take some digging to come up with biographical information. Rr
On Mar 25, 2017, at 2:22 PM, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
On 03/25/2017 11:08 AM, John Newman wrote:
On Mar 25, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
On 03/25/2017 08:40 AM, John Newman wrote:
On Mar 24, 2017, at 7:08 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-...
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
It seems to me Greenwald & co. used the Snowden revelations for self-enrichment to a very large degree. I guess you can argue all day long about their intentions, but there is no doubt the Snowden shit has been a massive gravy train for the journalists involved….
Not to say I would have stories put back in the bottle, obviously :P
I'd say the Snowden Papers put The_Intercept on the continuation-of-publishing-viability 'gravy train' anyway. I haven't seen what @ggreenwald's tax returns look like so I have no way of judging his, or any of the staff's self-enrichment due to them.
This article <http://frostsnow.com/glenn-greenwald-s-net-worth-is-8-5-billion-know-about-his-career-and-awards> claims his net worth was $8.5 billion dollars in 2013, before the Snowden papers fell in his lap, so it would seem he just doesn't need the money that much to swing in his hammock down in Brasil, and he was the founding partner of a law firm, not a cheap proposition, so his wealth likely precedes his publishing career. Further, according to Wikipedia he did his BA in Philosophy at GWU... NOT an inexpensive school to take a non-career-path Baccalaureate, so it would seem wealth was in the family before he ever had a career.
Rr
Interesting, I had no idea Greenwald was a BILLIONAIRE - presumably born that way? Or born with a lot of money and turned into more with legal career?
In any case, changes my perspective a little. have to do some digging ;)
John
He certainly doesn't flaunt his wealth. I'm perhaps a little skeptical of the $8.5 billion figure but on the other hand net worth is an interesting calculation that can include intangibles and such.
I think he was born into money. Wikipedia lists his parent's names but they don't have entries on site so it would take some digging to come up with biographical information.
Rr
The article actually says 8.5 Million in the body of the piece - "As per Forbes estimation in 2013, 49 year old Glenn is standing with a net worth of $8.5 million. This figure is supposed to have increased significantly since then." And the first comment on the page says - "You dummies have mixed up Greenwald's net worth with that of Ebay founder Pierre Omidyar, who had funded a joint venture with Greenwald. Omidyar is/was worth 8.5 billion." So i am extremely dubious Greenwald is worth anywhere near 8.5 billion ;) But the main link still has billion in the URL... maybe they made a correction to the body of the article? Still, 8.5M is a lot of money. But it's not ultra ruling elite money like 8.5B ..... John
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 14:39:26 -0400 John Newman <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
The article actually says 8.5 Million in the body of the piece -
"As per Forbes estimation in 2013, 49 year old Glenn is standing with a net worth of $8.5 million. This figure is supposed to have increased significantly since then."
And the first comment on the page says -
"You dummies have mixed up Greenwald's net worth with that of Ebay founder Pierre Omidyar, who had funded a joint venture with Greenwald. Omidyar is/was worth 8.5 billion."
Indeed. How can you pay attention to any garbage that "rayzer" blurts =) - For completness sake https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/6/#version:static Obviously greenwald isn't on that list. Furthermore, why would a guy who already stole thousands of millions sell himself to paypal for 250? But hey, logic isn't rayzer's strong suit...
So i am extremely dubious Greenwald is worth anywhere near 8.5 billion ;)
But the main link still has billion in the URL... maybe they made a correction to the body of the article?
Still, 8.5M is a lot of money.
It's the minimum that a liberal left progressive needs to lead a half decent life. But it's not ultra ruling elite money
like 8.5B .....
John
On 03/25/2017 11:39 AM, John Newman wrote:
On Mar 25, 2017, at 2:22 PM, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
On 03/25/2017 11:08 AM, John Newman wrote:
On Mar 25, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
On 03/25/2017 08:40 AM, John Newman wrote:
On Mar 24, 2017, at 7:08 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-...
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
It seems to me Greenwald & co. used the Snowden revelations for self-enrichment to a very large degree. I guess you can argue all day long about their intentions, but there is no doubt the Snowden shit has been a massive gravy train for the journalists involved….
Not to say I would have stories put back in the bottle, obviously :P
I'd say the Snowden Papers put The_Intercept on the continuation-of-publishing-viability 'gravy train' anyway. I haven't seen what @ggreenwald's tax returns look like so I have no way of judging his, or any of the staff's self-enrichment due to them.
This article <http://frostsnow.com/glenn-greenwald-s-net-worth-is-8-5-billion-know-about-his-career-and-awards> claims his net worth was $8.5 billion dollars in 2013, before the Snowden papers fell in his lap, so it would seem he just doesn't need the money that much to swing in his hammock down in Brasil, and he was the founding partner of a law firm, not a cheap proposition, so his wealth likely precedes his publishing career. Further, according to Wikipedia he did his BA in Philosophy at GWU... NOT an inexpensive school to take a non-career-path Baccalaureate, so it would seem wealth was in the family before he ever had a career.
Rr
Interesting, I had no idea Greenwald was a BILLIONAIRE - presumably born that way? Or born with a lot of money and turned into more with legal career?
In any case, changes my perspective a little. have to do some digging ;)
John
He certainly doesn't flaunt his wealth. I'm perhaps a little skeptical of the $8.5 billion figure but on the other hand net worth is an interesting calculation that can include intangibles and such.
I think he was born into money. Wikipedia lists his parent's names but they don't have entries on site so it would take some digging to come up with biographical information.
Rr
The article actually says 8.5 Million in the body of the piece -
"As per Forbes estimation in 2013, 49 year old Glenn is standing with a net worth of $8.5 million. This figure is supposed to have increased significantly since then."
And the first comment on the page says -
"You dummies have mixed up Greenwald's net worth with that of Ebay founder Pierre Omidyar, who had funded a joint venture with Greenwald. Omidyar is/was worth 8.5 billion."
So i am extremely dubious Greenwald is worth anywhere near 8.5 billion ;)
But the main link still has billion in the URL... maybe they made a correction to the body of the article?
Still, 8.5M is a lot of money. But it's not ultra ruling elite money like 8.5B .....
John
Unless that "8.5" is remnant to the misprint and not relevant as well. Rr
GG's alleged net worth off by 000, merely $8.5 million not billion as FrostSnow reports despite its eyeball grabbing headline. However, the site is a spoof, as are most net worth sources: net worth bogus claims can be purchased as PR for very little, not unlike bankruptcy declarations. According to IRS reports for First Look Media, GG is paid by the org about $500K annually. Probably a few times that for fees, royalties, investments, off-shore tax avoidances well-used by attorneys, other unmentionables. Don't expect to see his tax returns for US, UK, Brazil, Russia, Germany, France, Japan, China, Cayman, Panama, Ireland, Iceland, et al. Nor those of Assange, Snowden, Poitras, Scahill, all those milking the lucrative leak and natsec opposition-crypto-privacy industry. At 12:13 PM 3/25/2017, you wrote:
On 03/25/2017 08:40 AM, John Newman wrote:
On Mar 24, 2017, at 7:08 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/24/apple-says-it-fixed-cia-vulnerabilities-...
for people who haven't been paying attention, the majority of articles published by the intercept are garbage like the one linked above.
one would think greenwald being the founder and editor has some kind of responsibility for and control over the government propaganda he publishes.
notice that the majority of comments on the article are rational and hostile to that sort of content - yet the intercept doesn't give a fuck
notice also that the 'progressive' 'lefty' intercept is actually a mouthpice for the flagship of american fascist corporatism, apple inc. Perhaps hardly surprising if one takes into account that the intercept is owned by paypal inc.
It seems to me Greenwald & co. used the Snowden revelations for self-enrichment to a very large degree. I guess you can argue all day long about their intentions, but there is no doubt the Snowden shit has been a massive gravy train for the journalists involved ¦.
Not to say I would have stories put back in the bottle, obviously :P
I'd say the Snowden Papers put The_Intercept on the continuation-of-publishing-viability 'gravy train' anyway. I haven't seen what @ggreenwald's tax returns look like so I have no way of judging his, or any of the staff's self-enrichment due to them.
This article <http://frostsnow.com/glenn-greenwald-s-net-worth-is-8-5-billion-know-about-his-career-and-awards> claims his net worth was $8.5 billion dollars in 2013, before the Snowden papers fell in his lap, so it would seem he just doesn't need the money that much to swing in his hammock down in Brasil, and he was the founding partner of a law firm, not a cheap proposition, so his wealth likely precedes his publishing career. Further, according to Wikipedia he did his BA in Philosophy at GWU... NOT an inexpensive school to take a non-career-path Baccalaureate, so it would seem wealth was in the family before he ever had a career.
Rr
participants (5)
-
Cari Machet -
John Newman -
John Young -
juan -
Razer