On July 21, 2016 11:59:37 AM EDT, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:56:56 -0400 John <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:
On July 21, 2016 5:21:04 AM EDT, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:51:49 +0000 Sean Lynch <seanl@literati.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:59 PM juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:44:16 +0300 Georgi Guninski <guninski@guninski.com> wrote:
Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives and move to something allegedly better?
We need to get rid of tor first. Resources wasted on tor are resources that can't be used in good projects.
They are not your resources to redirect,
No they are not mine. They belong to the people who the US gov't/military robs. No taxes no tor.
Well, phrasing I guess, but most of the relays just belong to volunteers.
Apologies John, I really don't mean to pick on you personally.
I'd point out though that the organization exists thanks to state funding. The whole thing would be rather different if all the participants were volunteers.
(are all high speed nodes also run by and paid for volunteers?)
Good question, i actually don't know the answer.. I expect the relationships get pretty incestuous at the higher levels. The top 10 "public" relays are all doing in the range of 50MB/s+.... You can browse the public relays here - https://atlas.torproject.org/ For comparison, my relay, when it's up, is capped at 200KB/s. John -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.