Looking at some YouTubes, it's evident to some of us that there's some pretty serious lay investigations going on right now, causing a bit of flip out here and there by the MSM. For example, first InfoWars gets a substantial "point in time" summary out, which (just like the David Duke interview) promptly gets taken offline - try these links, but if these are also taken down (like previous uploads), keep searching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sh2qZBFJsqA (z2Ie6AG4VGE was the first one, now deleted) Analysis of the situation as at December 6th, 2016, e.g. Joe Biggs quits AlexJones, 'yesterday' (Dec 5th), tweets about it ("I'll be freelancing") then deletes his tweet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLBW2T1qroc So the suggestion is to lay investigators, to investigate under the radar, rather than publish every tiny step forward. This sounds sensible. Question: if you hit the motherload, what do you do? How do you get the information out there? Via Wikileaks or something? Just read up on Wikileaks, and how they suggest to safely leak docs? What about in the face of the present uncertainty about the continued existence of the life of the man Julian Assange? This is from the point of view of the lay investigator who might otherwise get themselves into hot water quickly, and fail to get their info out. Whom do you trust (in real life), may be a good starting question for those who have not leaked before? -- * Certified Deplorable Neo-Nazi Fake News Hunter (TM)(C)(R) * Executive Director of Triggers, Ministry of Winning * Weapons against traditional \/\/European\/\/ values: http://davidduke.com/jewish-professor-boasts-of-jewish-pornography-used-as-a...