On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:38:57 -0500 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
The executor posts the interaction video
ah yes. That's pretty anonymous...so on the technical side : 1) there's no anonymous network 2) putting a bounty on someone's head doesn't necessarily mean the target would get killed. The thinking that 'the market' will magically provide any 'service' is just magical thinking. Wishful thinking. 3) the list of problems is prolly (a lot) longer. Those two are just off the to of my head. on the political side : tyrannicide is fully legitimate and useful, but the idea that AP is an option for a liberal justice system is sheer nonsense, as illustrasted by Jim's 'idea' of executing thieves. At that point Jim invokes voluntary courts, while conveniently ignoring that liberals 'invented' liberal anarchy in the 19th century. Then again, that's the typical modus operandi of advocates of 'intellectual property' - which is actually intelectual theft. It's also quite notable that Jim has flatly 'claimed' that : "very few anarchists have ever realized that 'anarchy' is hopelessly unstable and could never possibly work" ... ... ...