On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:50:45 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/13/20, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:27:09 -0400 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote: Anyway, if you want something else to do, then figure out what a p2p network that uses fill traffick would look like. See what kind of feedback you get from the rest of the list....if you get any at all.
I'm more interested in actually starting work. There's a ton of research and talk about it.
there's indeed a ton of garbage 'papers' here (exactly what you'd expect from 'academic' parasites working for the govt) https://www.freehaven.net/anonbib/date.html I've taken a look at more than a few of them and apart from the ones that show that tor is a failure(for users, not for the pentagon of course), I didn't find any 'working solution'. as a side note and shockingly, a lot of the 'papers' are written by a small mafia 'led' by US military scum syverson. also, there are things like i2p and freenet that seldom if ever get mentioned...
If you want a start for an idea, how about an onion-router like tor, except each link has a set constant transfer rate.
well yeah you need onion routing and constant rate links, that much is clear...
If you want more bandwidth, open another link to the same node, and spread bytes between them.
There's going to be some issue, and the plan could be adjusted to accommodate the issue. It's most important to build it at this point.
build without a plan and then get people to use some half-backed thing that would land them in jail. Good.