On 01/21/2016 12:25 AM, juan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:11:51 -0800 Rayzer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
juan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:19:10 -0500 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
"When a person drives a car on a highway, he or she agrees to display a license plate,"
false
Spoken like a true right wing jackass me-first sovereign citizen.
I'll bet you think you're an anarchist too!
Dude. You're the one who quotes doug casey.
It doesn't matter WHO one quotes. The only thing that matters is one's WORLDVIEW, and I stick to what I said. You're a right winger and don't even know it. Steve Kinney wrote:
As an anarchist, I have no problem recognizing the difference between consent, and making accommodations to coercive demands as a matter of tactical discretion.
Calling compliance with arbitrary orders from people who carry guns and radios "consent" is like saying that every person who has ever been raped "was asking for it."
So can we get a consensus that someone operating a 1-2 ton weapon of environmental and generally Mass Destruction, including but not limited to taking someone's life, should not only prove to 'the herd' they're capable, or at least KNOW how to operate said WMD properly (license), and have responsibility for that WMD, their personal property, evidenced (registration) for the rest of us ? -- RR "Freedom is the capacity to pause between stimulus and response." ~Rollo May