Dnia piątek, 2 października 2015 17:00:42 Juan pisze:
You know, the first requirement to win an argument is to pick the right side. And statism isn't the right side of the argument.
I am not arguing for nor against statism. I am voiving my opinion that regardless of how we call it, there *will* be structure/hierarchy sooner or later in any "sociely" you want to build.
re : 'division of power' - the incentives for people who have power lead them to COOPERATE to maintain or gain more power, not to 'check' each other's power. ABC of economics.
Cool, show me a better, more workable model, and I'm happy to roll with it.
etc) and build upon them or try implementing them in a more functional way, or... go the "ignore it altogether" route, end up reinventing the wheel, and arriving at a not-all- that-functional variation of it.
So, you are willing to 'cooperate' with the current criminals and justify them while accusing a bunch of anarchist of 'maybe' doing something that goes against their principles?
Who said anything about cooperation? I was merely remarking that inevitably one way or the other we will land in a state-like organisation. Not saying it's good. -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147