Show me the man and I will find you the crime.
here is an example of these dynamics... say you are living in a surveillance society ruled by a hidden and malicious yet bounded dictatorship, so its malcious actions must be stealthy to break the illusion that a democracy has fallen into private despotism (which explains alot)... and so there are people who are politically oppressed who are targeted. say black bag jobs, censorship, bugs in your walls, active hostile monitoring and abuse and harassment as feedback. yet this also occurs in a context of 'private psychology' of the oppressors that is separated from the state, its beliefs, constitution, etc. knowing this, a person may live in a fishbowl that is routinely disrupted and their life not allowed to develop due to these conditions, essentially an open-air prison and only a matter of time and further political consolidation before extinction. that the oppressors have a A=B mindset then could allow a false perspective to be constructed, validating a sign=sign belief of the oppressors, thus establishing a boundary that confirms their ideological viewpoint of a given situation (reversing perspective, or reversing the panopticon). prisoners monitoring the guards, etc. so, a person may pursue the age-old, time worn, and time-tested Bearded Lady at the Circus routine, in this given context. and this event could confirm or ground to certain preconceived notions and views of the hidden observers, who seek to exploit this *hidden* data they are gathering and distributing via illegal surveillence. (in doing so, allowing their activities and distribution channels and political networks to themselves be thoroughly mapped...) Bearded Lady at the Circus https://www.dropbox.com/sh/e82s8vywvxlkoko/hxey1wl8FT so suddenly the secret network has its valuable data to frame a person with, they could even work to "out them" as a result and this could be monitored by an inmate, as to what tactics and techniques are used, and where the ideology begins and ends. that is, if beliefs are verified by matching patterns (in this sense: pT = pT), then it is equated with grounded truth (B=B), even though it could be only an illusion. or bounded within certain dimensionality or thresholds. so imagine the Dictator and their political groupies have such hidden data on someone and it could even be presented as if a crime, say for a corollary example, and that their release of such data is a threat that in its actualization would secure their victory-- their "true belief" that rationalizes and finitely determines events in their favor would be fully established by discrediting and criminalizing opponents to despotism. this occurs on the assumption that they can control the parameters by which an event is evaluated, such that a [event] in their limited framework would automatically tally into their calculation of universal truth (A=A), though this is based on bad faith and exploitation of truth to serve the observers, firstly, and thus they are "truth" and "law" and so forth. what is not accounted for in their private relativistic psychology is that the situation could be accounted for from all angles, as an ['event'], and that in this reframing from their limited self-serving viewpoint, a recontexualization could involve them and prove their involvement in this event, so they are not outside of it nor able to control its interpretation, and instead are in a model of the situation beyond their determination over it, via empirical analysis of the total situation. thus for instance if someone broke the legs of a child and kept this out of their observational equation, and then yelled and blamed the child for not being able to run, and even demands that they run with broken legs, the observer could say the child is not running because they are lazy or weak, not accounting for the injuries and malice. yet an external viewpoint could account for the breaking of the legs of the child by the observer, which is not accounted for in their self-serving viewpoint, due to its inherent biasing to a given interpretation, which could even be subconscious or covert, *hidden* or encrypted in the psyche of a silent running sleeper agent who has done terrible things yet plausibly can deny this because they are able to separate or compartmentalize this truth from their conscious belief, unless pressured enough to make errors, where A=B dynamics appear and must be resolved to reestablish psychic equilibrium, or it is a dangerous existence that only gets more polarized and in this way, increasingly schizoid as the world does not align with a worldview which becomes fragmented and at odds with itself in its onesided, conflicted reasoning in this way, the previous example of a hidden dictator having incriminating evidence could be viewed as their "sure thing" that is going to bring down an opponent, this as it relates to the drug war for most people in the depths, likely, as one instance of many approaches to blackmail and takedowns. the threat of imprisonment, or assassination if you are lucky, etc. and yet that limited perspective is ungrounded in the larger situation, reliant on a false perspective to establish such dynamics, power, control over events and their hidden interpretation and secret determination. this pT=T worldview of the dictator makes assumptions that are not wholly true nor accurate about other observers and their observations, because a false perspective could also be established for the dictator- so that things *appear* a certain way via feedback (B=B) yet that this is not actually the truth of what is going on, beyond that limited and controlled despotic boundary. it is an illusion, a fantasy detached from empirical reality - yet allowed, and thereby enables a pattern match between what is believed and what is seen, for the ungrounded true believers of despotic ideology. in other words, another reality (A=A) could exist in this same situation, albeit within different parameters, co-existing yet silent as a parallel yet _grounded reality. thus it really comes down to an issue of accounting for truth and how it is modeled, both in terms of observations yet importantly, critically- how the observers are themselves accounted for in their evaluations and claims. empirical truth removed of falsity (T) is a different perspective than relativistic pseudo-truth (pT) that includes and relies upon errors and to justify given viewpoints that equate with 'true beliefs'. there should be no allowance for such structural bias, distortion, warping, and skew of observation in terms of justice. error is essentially falsity in this 1 and 0 model, and it is not arbitrary, nor can denial of absolute truth disallow such investigations. key to this is 'belief' that is ungrounded, whereby "belief=belief" establishes truth (pT), instead of grounded belief that is empirically true (T). the former maps onto the individual or group that contains a worldview or viewpoint that is equated with truth, yet this is actually themselves that they are believing in, serving. their belief in truth is their belief in their own infallibility, their own ability to determine truth. it is about an observer whose mere act of ungrounded observation is ideologically believed to be a 1:1 correspondance with truth, as patterns match their biased viewpoints, and justify their correctness, thus allowing a self-righteous mindset inside of a protected finite boundary, that then has an internal model that is relativistic, 2-value, and not observant of unagreeable facts or reality or truth beyond this self-interested boundary. this essentially becomes a demographic of people who are *unbelievers* in truth outside their own viewpoints. this is insanely dangerous and violent ignorance. they happen to have taken over government to, as the private corps of the dictator. *believers* are those, in contrast, who defer to truth, recognize it beyond their limited boundary, via logical reasoning, and observe of views of events in their truth and do not seek to censor and shut down valid observations or make it conform to their limited worldview in order for it to be allowed or accepted as truth, only if it serves their self-interest or does not threaten their worldview and "belief system" or private religion (of self as if creator). so ungrounded observers could believe a partial-truth is universal even though warped and a false perspective, while grounded observers could know this and could have prepared a bounary condition that allows for this as an illusion, by ceding ~ground as it were, unaccounted for observations and activities that are effectively unnatural or virtual and tentative - lacking actual feedback to not spoil the illusion, and therefore a gigantic bubble-reality could exist surrounding and inside of this dictatorship where 'the reality' that is believed to exist is not actually real, and a given event could puncture the illusion and remap all events into a different, more accurate framework. in this way, 'the crime' that may be believed absolute truth in the self-serving viewpoint, not accounted for beyond the corrupt evaluation and biased interpretation, could function differently than expected for the dictator, whose goal is to play this as part of their winning hand... and thus if they have incriminating evidence, for instance, of the [crime], say it is of a closeted transvestite who is a male-lesbian, this could be their ace in the hole to play against an adversary as part of a game-winning strategy, wrongly believed equivalent to "burst the bubble" on the other side via politically exploiting the evidence... and so their poker hand could be a ROYAL FLUSH, the secret evidence the [ace], with King, Queen, Jack, and Ten cards lined up across all suits in all directions, as if a universal winning hand, owning the table and every player. yet there is another possibility-- the ['ace'] could actually be the lowest card, instead of the highest as believed. and thus it could be equivalent to a 1-card, king (2), queen (3), jack (4), ten (5), whereby the metaphysics of the game are different than expected. this is because 'the crime' could be interpreted beyond the self-serving limiting viewpoint and account for the role of the dicator in establishing the context for the crimes and involving in the criminality while seeking to judge other sin these same terms. how much hypocrisy can an entity contain, how much psychopathy, malice and ultimately: falsehood. it then becomes a dare. if they release their evidence it can be turned against them, especially with massive external evidence they are not even aware of, showing the direct involvement in oppression of the citizens of the state by the hidden dictatorship and those who serve it. and then it would be possible to account for other truth beyond the limited dimensions used as *threats* and as a basis for actual violence and oppression, harassment and even TORTURE of citizens, in these terms, to secure the false worldview as if 'reality' itself, yet in a private framework that only serves a specific group at the expense of everyone, for that epically wicked selfishness it is thus about how the truth is accounted for, in an ungrounded pattern-matched evaluation of relativistic [signs] in an agreed upon private political evaluation, or of the ['truth'] involved throughout the signs and language and claims and beliefs and grounded observations, in a single shared model of empirical truth, of the given events. without a free press (crypto.corrupted) that is extremely difficult, because their view is what scales easiest as an alternative viewpoint. and thus there is silence. though the dictator may believe or _feel this equates with acquiescence, affirming the rightness of their secret yet harmful rule. and it does not. it matters where the lines are drawn as to how this situation is perceived. and to be honest- these people are truly stupid, they have a limited intellectual capacity to deal with this situation and so that is easily exploited. yet the continuation of an illusion does not mean safety. and the tension in the air as things polarize will only be more and more telling. the best move by the dictator would be to make the attack, make the claim, bring the charges- arrest the perpetrator, bring the issue to public trial instead of secret judge, jury, executioner. it would validate the hardness, virility of their truth, as it corresponds with an extended sentence for the crime as portrayed. yet the failure to achieve this-- the faulty approach or unsubstantiated case or contrary evidence would instead shrink this "sure thing" should the approach fail, and political impotence and total loss of power and legitimacy would result in not succeeding in the normal channels. the fraudulent case and viewpoint would collapse as its interpretation goes beyond the boundary of the accuser, to involve the accuser of deep involvement in this and vast many other crimes against the human citizenry. so they would be on trial if they should bring a case and the collapse of government and their rule over it would be accounting for in any such legal deliberations. likewise, doing nothing brings impotence likewise as the false worldview is folded back upon itself into smaller and smaller territories of self-controlled belief, as the views once shared are fragmented and disconnected in their operational cohensiveness, and thus this particilized constituency would find itself outside the prevailing view which it cannot share or understand due to limits resulting from self-corruption and ideological conformance, and belief in superiority they now have to rationalize in polarized, contested, and very likely in fighting terms, with those they have oppressed by their ignorance and malicious intent. those most active and powerful will be weakened by outside comparison, even appearing foolish to themselves as irrationalism takes hold and madness sets in, once realizing their awful predicament in this way, while things could appear to /certainly/ be moving from A to B, given a series of moves, in a more complex environment an inversion could have taken place that recontextualizes the ground upon which these events take place, and at a critical juncture, a decisive moment could arrive where TRUTH=FALSITY for the other oppressive observer, where the binary worldview completely collapses into its opposite framework where only partial truth (pT) is allowed to be validated in a shared POV and that the evaluation goes beyond the given controlling constraints, thus allowing parallel observation via human identity as the shared empirical perspective, versus an ungrounded false perspective reliant on lies, falsehood, errors, to serve a private view and constituency to the ruin of the earth, life, and humanity there are no odds. there is only truth and its accounting. anything less is tyranny. ☑