data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37c1b/37c1b93102141694db856d83b99de839eb6f37c9" alt=""
7 Mar
2016
7 Mar
'16
9:18 a.m.
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:41:05PM +0100, rysiek wrote:
So let me pose a question here: is it possible to design a protocol that does not succumb to economy of scale-based secondary centralisation? Is it possible to design a protocol that does not lend itself to economy of scale?
Maybe it is possible to design such, but design is not that important. You _must_ implement it in the real world(tm). Some of your threats include: people technology (backdoors, bugs, sickyouaruty) TLAs governments Won't be surprised if bitcoin is illegal in parts of the real world(tm).