11 Jul
2017
11 Jul
'17
8:33 p.m.
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 04:22:59 -0400 Kevin Gallagher <kevin.gallagher@nyu.edu> wrote:
Here is where I start to have questions. To my understanding, anarchy is the rejection of heirarchies. Isn't anarcho-capitalism therefore an oxymoron? The existence of currency inherently creates a heirarchy based on the amount of currency one owns, does it not?
currency? You actually mean property? But since you mentioned currency, what sort of economic system with no 'currency' are you proposing? One with no economic exchanges, I should guess?