tonight in the us of agh on 60 minutes they had on a giant ad for the NSA fr what i understand alexander has his office set up as star trek battleship and this was really weird they do standing meetings with a blue light on where he gets a report read to him - they gave the appearance of children playing a game they said every summer they have high school student interns break code for them and they are highly successful i just wonder if ppl are thinking about the bio sphere at all in terms of some sort of 'encryption' method i mean if we can work outside of the little box they have made for themselves (and us) then mayb things r movable? Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Skype carimachet - 646-652-6434 Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited. On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Juan Garofalo <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
--On Monday, December 16, 2013 12:27 AM -0800 coderman <coderman@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Juan Garofalo <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
[ a lot of things ... ]
this is all coming to a few conclusions, where we simply disagree:
a) the black budget was leaked, along with other leaks about technical capabilities and programs and priorities. intelligence community is not immune to government budget pressure. you insist there is a limitless expansion, and an unlimited technical ability. i disagree.
I didn't say limitless. If it sounded that way, let me rephrase to :
Governments can spend a lot more money than a 'for-profit' enterprise in a (hypothetical) free market. Private firms go bankrupt. Governments and their 'agencies' usually don't.
I'd be surprised if you disagreed too much with that =P
b) you insist Tor's origins and funding sources are proof of malfeasance;
I didn't say it's direct proof. I do say they are (highly) suspect. But that was an aside.
My point here is that the assertion (paraphrasing)
"the nsa doesn't play the global passive adversary game against tor" is unfounded.
Schneier flatly said "they can't break tor" - which is something you don't even agree as far as I can tell, but you regard as too costly (rather than impossible)
they've responded by diversifying funding. (not to mention scrutiny of Tor by external, mututally un-trusting parties. you can look at the code yourself, and interface with controller and path construction yourself, etc.)
c) we both appear to agree that limiting solutions to technical realms is missing the bigger picture. yes to political reform that cuts funding and restricts scope. yes to judicial reforms which demolish secret orders and secret courts. yes to social measures which value and reinforce privacy. yes to educational efforts which empower individuals to make privacy positive decisions, etc.
last but not least, i second the call to fix it. help write something better!
Yes, I want to write a one time pad for an arm microcontroller (in assembler) - OK, that doesn't fix the traffic analysis problem that tor is supposed to address, but seems to be a nice solution for encryption that even the NSA can't break =P
J.