Also, could somebody contact Declan McCullagh about this forgery news. I'd do it myself, but I don't want him to be able to use something I said as an excuse to not show up. Is it merely a coincidence that the forgery of the archive occurred at least as early as 2003, when I've pointed out that it was early 2002 that he decided not to further report on my case. His excuse at that time amounted to 'You're convicted now, Bell, so you are no longer a story'. Ask him now why. He has had an additional 17 years to think up an excuse.
Nonsense. Maybe he was threatened and scared off of the issue. If so, he should have the long-delayed courage to actually state this and explain why he didn't blow this story wide open in 2002-2003.
Jim Bell