On 2013-10-03 22:48, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote:
2013/10/3 Juan Garofalo <juan.g71@gmail.com>
--On Thursday, October 03, 2013 1:12 AM +0200 Lodewijk andré de la porte <l@odewijk.nl> wrote:
2013/10/2 Juan Garofalo <juan.g71@gmail.com>
 I think you need to research the ABC of political theory before saying
anything about anarchy. Your belief that anarchy is chaos is as unfounded
as it is laughable.

Anarchy as a word does not mean a thing.

Right, it doesn't mean one thing, it means *two* different and mutually exclusive things. It is vulgarly used to mean 'chaos', and it's used by advocates of voluntary interactions to describe a social system based on voluntary interactions.

This system fails in the sight of coercion by force. In fact coercion of any kind reduces the ideals i think you hold it to have.


Anarcho capitalism, anarcho piratism, and feudalism are related systems.

Any actually existent system tends to have elements of all three.

Saga period iceland was primarily anarcho capitalist in icelanders relationships with each other, and primarily anarcho piratist in their relations with distant peoples.  They abducted a whole lot of women from Ireland.

Feudalism with a King who is merely first among equals is anarcho capitalism in which those privileged to use force have established a cartel and local monopolies, but not a general monopoly.

Anarcho piratism is anarcho capitalism where the number of people who are out of law with each other is alarmingly large.