On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 06:16:35PM -0400, Marina Brown wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 10/21/18 6:05 PM, jim bell wrote:
state-demands-christian-us-filmmakers-m ake-same-sex-films-or-face-jail-time
How about looking at actual law rather than what some ideologue says ? "The goyim know" is a nazi site.
https://codes.findlaw.com/mn/human-rights-ch-363-363a/mn-st-sect-363a-02 .html
The question at hand appears to be whether wedding photography is a public service or accomodation.
Oh wow! You're absolutely right - thegoyimknow.to is utter Nazi right wing extremist propaganda - pure trolling. Here's a more up market link for ya: https://www.westernjournal.com/state-demands-christian-us-filmmakers-make-se... A Christian couple who owns a media company is suing the state of Minnesota after being threatened with fines and imprisonment if they refuse to make films involving same-sex marriage. ... (I won't paste it all in.) PS: Whether the question at hand trumps free speech and the right to freedom of thought/ religion/ belief, and the right to be NOT compelled to work for others against your own free will, is the REAL question at hand. This is an old barrister trick: a reasonably plump pidgeon loses a court case in a lowly Magistrate's court, and "muh principles" compel him (or shim) to "fight tha gud fight", but the system or deep state does not particularly want to see a win, but the dang pidgeon has a right to appeal. What to do? Well, the smooth barrister first offers a pro-bono deal that goes like this: "Look I know you don't have access to much funds, and really truly wuly I'd like to represent you pro-bono, but I have this other client here already, and they're already paid $25,000, so you see, unless we can come up with $25,000 to pay them back I won't be able to help you, see?" Now that's one FINE piece of social engineering if ever I saw one. Notwithstanding, pidgeon pays barrister, and what does barrister do? Barrister appeals the case "on a point of law" as is the want of 800 years of "fine English common law history", and asks a sophisticated sounding, but losing, question. Now I don't know about you, but asking some fine legal distinction between "photography is a public service, or accomodation" (and just ignoring free speech, compelled speech, compelled work, creative expression, right to freedom of religion/ thought/ etc) is an absolute classic of legal shirttuckery. Good luck, PS: If you're a little timid and scared of searching Googoyle, and really want some decent Nazi propaganda which will really twist your brain in three (DO --NOT-- GO THERE) there's an absolutely deplorable documentary “Adolf Hitler - The Greatest Story Never Told”. I've^B<ahem>A friend tells me it's really quite good despite being slow (spread over 3 DVDs) and therefore needing to be watched at roughly double speed. [<⟨Trigger warninpc: u might end up with RSI from making lampshades⟩>]