Re: change.org "declare antifa illegal/terrorist" petition

On 02/10/2017 10:28 AM, Joshua Case wrote:

meaning, you won’t interact with me unless it’s in front of other people?

Yup. That's Eggs-ackly what I mean.

because you need that level of attention?

No. Because you need the pubic 'exposure'.

I was just trying to reduce the level of idiocy before i just plain muted you, like everyone else on this list has, and are imploring me to do.

Odd. More intelligent people seem to respond to my posting, when they feel it, than I've seen responding to yours. But posting items to a list isn't a popularity contest ... now is it? It's really an insight of your interests, to others on the list...(and fwiw I don't consider the fascist trolls like Z, J, 'The Donald', and tentatively the wordy but still socially ignorant JB, really intelligent. Unless you consider reptilian aliens 'intelligent' in any way but socially vicious intelligence.)

i’m not insecure with respect to my intellect, or schmuckiness - i’m alarmed that you’d use such a patriarchal type of genitals insult. i’m smart enough to see through people like you, and i am not a penis.

Ah! You know some Yiddish! Ok then. Putz. Colloquially, 'Wasted sperm on the ground'. Just like you're wasting my time responding to you. For the last time. Rr

...

On Feb 10, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Razer mailto:g2s@riseup.net> wrote:

That's right. I'm insulting your intellect.

Don't contact me offlist again schmuck. I'm too busy for you nonsesne

On 02/10/2017 10:07 AM, Joshua Case wrote:

...

...

So are the people who run world governments that commit Genocide and the officers of corporations poisoning the planet (and our minds, with advertising of the products causing the physical poisoning).

You aren't making your case spewball.

"Rational" is relative.

Rr

...

I don’t agree with Jim on all points, hardly any maybe, but i’fe heard his stuff, listened to him talk. he’s rational, it seems.

That’s all you’ve got? An obvious and blatant strawman fallacy and some intellect insult? And no, rational is not relative - it’s not everywhere, but it’s not relative. It has a precise definition, and there is a mathematical proof for it.

You might spend more time reading, less time writing for a while.

Unless you’re just a paid troll to keep this list off topic, undermining productive countercultural projects and coordination. In which case, great work. Keep hitting send!