On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:27:30PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:17:12PM +0900, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote:
We can have a shared (UN?) court
Because fewer (but corruptible) institutions is better, right?
for determining things like permissible pollution and settling lawsuits that are carried all the way up. For settling disputes between nations, and their adherence to global law.
Sorry, all your one world / new world order shit can go to hell.
Not going to happen. Not going to fly here. Not going to be consented to by China nor Russia nor Australia.
Simply, there's no point arguing for it any more since at the very least BRICS has stamped an unstoppable foot on the world stage - we are all going to get a multi-polar world, whether you Americans like it or not.
I might be powerful, but even -my- words cannot stop BRICS now.
Russian victory lap for the multi polar world: A Brave, New Multipolar World: Lavrov Declares End of US Regime Change Dominoes http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/brave-new-multipolar-world-lavrov-decl... No significant insight yet from Zbig except "America should partner with China" which certainly seems rather 'yesterday' - perhaps the globalluminoligarchy has moved a bunch of their assets to the PROC?