On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 21:50:41 -0300 Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tanaka@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 3, 2016 7:51 PM, "juan" <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
My position is radically different to that of quinn and his mob
and yet you think we are both 'likeable'? Your opinions here are absurd.
Juan, you and Quinn are not my friends, but I appreciate both.
You don't know anything about me, apart from the political comments I've made here. Same thing for quinn. All we know about him is that he's a totalitarian american shitbag. Whatever your personal connection to him is, (if any) it's irrelevant here. It is absurd for you to conclude that I'm a 'good' person and that quinn is a 'good' person too, since we represent completely opposed views of what 'good' means. Is this so hard to grasp?
Certainly not enough to invite you to visit my house or to borrow money and books, but I like you both. :)
A fool example, I have friends who believe in God in a blind way and also extremely Atheists friends. They are good persons and I sincerely respect all of them.
'Religious' liars are not good persons. Lying is not good. It's becoming clear that 'good' doesn't really mean anything to you.
They have different personal beliefs, but they all have good character and are intelligent.
Not to mention, again, that you think that a totalitarian piece
of shit like quinn is a good guy. Since you believe that, your moral judgements are a bad joke...which shows what you really stand for.
He is a good person. Too moralist and intollerant for being my friend, but he is a good person.
OK. "Good" means nothing to you.
You are a good person, but very aggressive in some moments and pretty intollerant too.
Tell me Cecilia, is it OK for governments to exist? You know, the 'good' utopian governments that do stuff that you think is 'good', like, I don't know 'free' schooling for poor children. If I recall correctly you said you are not an anarchist, but I'm making sure...before pointing out that you are in no position to call me 'aggressive' or 'intolerant'.
Uff... Juan, you seem to know more about me than myself to judge me so bad in all the moments. Please, what do I really stand for?
See the stuff you posted and my comments...
Fine. I'm not tolerant either. I don't tolerate stupidity and
evil intentions or acts. As to being 'open minded', again, I'm certainly not open minded to stupidity. Being 'open minded' to stupidity is hardly a virtue.
Juan, if I show you some truth and you don't like it, you simply will say it is stupidity because you are too proud and hard headed for admissing when are wrong.
What am I wrong about?
I was not talking about nazism, only about extremely radical people: feminazis, vegan nazis, econazis, etc. Sorry, at least for me, radical people are always boring and/or annoing.
OK - and the relevance here is? Or was that just one more random and irrelevant thought?
I don't think your explanation changes anything. You want to
ignore this particular poll because it doesn't paint the americunts in a good light. But the poll is completely consistent with americunt 'culture'. If anything the real numbers are prolly higher.
Juan, it hurts me a lot because it is a pool about my family's death,
It's not just about your family. It about the fact that TODAY there are lots of people who support that kind of attrocity.
not because "doesn't paint the americans in a good light". It would hurt me the same if it was a pool about French people opinion, if it was a pool about Chinese people opinion... The problem is thinking about people saying that it was correct to use nuclear weapons to kill people.
The ones who are saying it are the americans. So tell me again about how good countries are and how much respect they deserve?
And, please, always remember that laws, sausages and researches are not made in a beautiful way. I don't trust in all researchers that I've knowed. I already saw some serious frauds in works and books.