To say it is "by far the best" treatment is obviously a comparison, not an absolute scale.

All in all, the public's handling of my AP essay has been atrociously incompetent.    For people who claim they love freedom and hate tyranny, I've described the solution.  People have had 26 years to disprove or just cast doubt on AP, and nobody has accomplished that.

AP will work, when tried.  

          Jim Bell

On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 7:25 PM, professor rat
<pro2rat@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
Oh please. 
You just said this Suk paper was the best take you'd seen on your essay and it elided section 10 completely. 
You know you really sound brain-damaged ever since you talked to Jeff Berwick.
You could probably use some professional help.

On Monday, 30 August 2021, 12:12:37 pm AEST, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:


I withdraw nothing of my Assassination Politics essay.

        Jim Bell




>  
>  
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 6:22 PM, professor rat
> <pro2rat@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>  
>
> Let the record reflect Jim Dumb-bell Dolton has now washed his hands of ' Section 10 ' of his 1995 Essay on Assassination Politics.  His idea now boils down to a technocratic ' Black Box ' scheme involving strict secrecy and a scheme to be promoted by elitist specialists and apparently enjoyed only by the far-libertarian Right. 
> He is no longer an anarchist, and judging by the Neo-Nazi criminals he associates with in the last few years he really hates anarchism. 
>
> On Monday, 30 August 2021, 05:09:43 am AEST, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes, Sukumaran's essay is by far the most competent treatment of my Assassination Politics idea and essay.
>          Jim Bell
>
>
>>  
>>  
>> On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 11:45 AM, grarpamp
>> <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 
>> http://idsa.in/system/files/strategicanalysis_sukumaran_0604.pdf
>
>