On 10/06/2015 03:25 PM, rysiek wrote: See my just posted response to "Juan's Vision". The middleman OPERATES A CENTRALIZED MARKET they expect others to participate in. "Anarchist Economics 101" doesn't remove them. It points to the fact we don't NEED them. People that want to profit over other people need them, but individuals do not have to cooperate ... until the middlemen conspire with 'People that want to profit over other people" to hire people with guns to enforce their markets.
Dnia poniedziałek, 5 października 2015 10:10:58 Razer pisze:
The middleman exists to see to it that the exchange is NOT entirely
voluntary, and I'm back to that bloody fantasy about Marketers and sales engineers... Are you saying that if the exchange happens *without* money, it necessarily happens *without* middlemen? Are you saying that if the exchange happens *with* money, it necessarily happens *with* middlemen?
Are you saying that if the exchange happens *with* money, it necessarily *is not* entirely voluntary? Are you saying that if the exchange happens *without* money, it necessarily *is* entirely voluntary? I said: "The middleman exists to see to it that the exchange is NOT entirely voluntary..." (which, for a start, is why they hire or 'tempt into service with future rewards from the proceeds of their position in the middle of
On 10/05/2015 03:06 AM, rysiek wrote: the transaction' armies of people with the biggest weapons)
No to the first, and the rest. I made no claim whatsoever that the medium of exchanges' form matters, and if you want an answer to the question YOU raised I do not believe the form matters.
But then, I don't really understand. Help me out here. Where, then, are the middlemen? How does your remove them?