On 10/09/2015 07:19 PM, Michael Best wrote:
Maybe because Mike _published_ the fucking logs, just because JYA was doing the mirror shades thing about whether the archive was or was not genuine? I mean, JYA can be a very funny man. For sure. But does that justify publishing Cryptome access logs?
I published them to verify the data, *AFTER JYA publicly accused me of FAKING it.* I only raised the point of the logs because of the GCHQ slide. *If *John had verified it a week earlier, or not accused me of faking data (with ZERO evidence, and the data turns out to be legit) *they never would've been published. *
Publishing them was still unwarranted. You could have published a redacted version. You could have polled this list, and verified selected lines. Whatever. Yes, JYA was being a jerk. But still ...