Fauci is wealthy. So are most of his colleagues His wealth comes from
business deals with businesses who need his approvals for medications in
which they have monopolies.
This seems to be a really important component of the argument: that Fauci personally profits from the medications he recommends. Do you agree that if he *doesn't* profit in this way, the argument that he's intentionally undermining Ivermectin to protect his investment sorta falls apart?
If so, it feels really important to determine if this is in fact true. Can you point me to why you feel this is true?
-davi