On 08/20/2016 01:05 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:40:43AM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
I don't see the point. As Juan so likes to remind us, Tor design is fundamentally flawed, in that it's vulnerable to global adversaries. Which, in practice, means US military. So how would a fork not be vulnerable as well? Instead, why not develop something better?
Agreed. As I read it, this is not Tor fork, just the browser, right?
| Short Term: Achieve technical parity with regard to security and | features to predecessor codebases through rapid inclusion of | upstream commits. | Short Term: Add functionality to allow browser users to select | chosen network traversal method (Tor vs Independent Onion Routing). | Short Term: Begin Independent Onion Router network infrastructure | deployment. Right. I was referring to "Independent Onion Router network".