Re: Fwd: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do

2 Mar 2017


      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 03/01/2017 04:06 AM, grarpamp wrote:
...
What you quote not wrote by me.
Sorry, my bad.  Lost track of how many layers deep it was.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYtvuTAAoJEECU6c5Xzmuq2/sIAMj4sGFnhP/f5pKDcw43rgK/
eDMUQi8tQisQCFXzZfCA8qJmUx3FolStYFoVZ8ToixitLpXZrxiw1WikeGO+g7GX
39IArelEU9DwDClK/qSP4jkGX6tgEZxlufnqfbGWO6nv9C6whsOc9kbDTL9eBlkD
ZsZtzuqfhdYMjow34fmhNan/Q757boMIy5UqxunBekZEGhj8AjggkCmvYkJHhDnX
lVlj1XBIAIZmotjME2JIhe9STgHUztMPvL6tqpUWTfkfjysSH3HTmi7YpToIsUoS
4JLLW4sZvHfoxOUXabL+//GDxEmLOeThQqCQlnF1blnqSoSwkZaDoqzxHkD/L5g=
=55Mp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Fwd: [Cryptography] Schneier's Internet Security Agency - bad idea because we don't know what it will do

Steve Kinney