8 Jan
2014
8 Jan
'14
7:44 a.m.
--On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 4:35 AM -0300 Juan Garofalo <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
That is the charges against Aaron Swartz. http://docs.jstor.org/summary.html
That's a link to jstor. Irrelevant.
And thank you again James. "Our monitoring systems did not alert us to accelerated downloading at MIT in November and most of December. By mid-December we had completed work on the redirect and, pending testing by JSTOR and by MIT, planned to implement the change in early January 2011. Later, we discovered that significant downloading had, in fact, continued during this time using a method that we did not detect. " So, the disruption was oh so bad...that they couldn't even detect it.