On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 05/17/2017 08:43 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 05/17/2017 08:15 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Steven Schear <schear.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
Any bets on whether ending cryptocurrency (esp. bitcoin) privacy & fungibility will be near the top of the discussions?
Sorry, Steven, I don't know, but already asked them. Sincerely hope so.
You _hope so_?
Seriously?
That's a horrible idea.
I said " I hope so" because it's important discussing these subjects too. The privacy is being attacked in the whole world, unfortunately. :(
I suppose that it's good to discuss the issue.
Still, saying "ending cryptocurrency (esp. bitcoin) privacy & fungibility" is an extremely offensive thing to say on this list. What we need is to discuss how to _protect_ cryptocurrency privacy and fungibility.
Aaaah, I understand his question now! Sorry, my love, I misunderstood Steven's comment about privacy questions. I do *NOT* support "ending cryptocurrency (esp. bitcoin) privacy & fungibility", neither ISOC does. ISOC defends and protects these values. I thought he wanted to discuss the ending of them in several countries. Sorry again! :P
Hmm... Did I understand wrongly Steven's question, Mirimir? Remember my English is pretty limited yet and I don't want to attack the privacy, only to discuss it. :P
Sorry, Cecilia. I'm just touchy about this stuff.
Pardon, Mirimir, my vocabulary is limited, my English is a disaster and I need to sleep at least one night. Not a good phase, my love. Sorry.