Hmm. This site may state that coronavirus is a conspiracy. That's frustrating. It is so obvious that both sides of the coronavirus topic are incredibly heavily funded. How to sift reality from the chaff?
Generally, in my country, academics are really getting a lot of truths replaced by lies. Serious research papers are entirely ignored for decades. So I support vaccines and lockdowns because I know we need a norm of trusting academia more, and those things tend to come from academia.
Let's check out this link.
[apologies for html, i'm stuck on a mobile device and don't know how to find plain text composition, currently using google's spookmail app]
> Coronavirus scare and the blueprint for slavery
Woah! With that heading, no wonder the site only garners interest from people already upset. Personally, I am aware that there is a _lot_ more slavery than quarantines and vaccines already going on, but it sure is exciting that anybody at all is talking about it!
I shared a book recently that has a similar issue with its title. I wonder if the author was struggling to come up with something that grabbed people.
Quote:
EndQuote
The links change sizes and colors. These are information-filled triggers for existing victims of the government mafia slavery, but for most people they make the site look very unprofessional. It is great to see diverse attributes able to come together so readily, in this formatting.
Oh, the blue ones are the sections, and the yellow ones the subsections. After seeing the changing colors, it takes a bit for me to get through my brainwashing flashbacks that look designed to stimulate gang violence and political conflict. Red and blue ... together. Red and blue ... together. Oh, that's yellow, my fucking god.
The extent of organised content in this table of contents really helps it look credible. It also helps people trying to act on it actually work with it: it makes it more valuable and useful to them.
.... I WANT TO PASTE IN MORE BUT IT IS HARD TO WORK WITH MY PHONE, THE HYPERLINKS-AS-CITATIONS, AND THE COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS THAT DISPLACE THE TEXT. Sorry for caps, still handling programmed triggers densely. The beginning of the document looks like it could be factual, to me, but I have not read it yet.